Uh and Um Revisited: Are They Interjections for Signaling Delay?Daniel C. O’Connell, Sabine H. Kowal2005-11-01articleJournal of Psycholinguistic Research103 citationsclosedNo readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.Language, Discourse, Communication StrategiesPhonetics and Phonology ResearchLinguistic Studies and Language AcquisitionAbstractNo abstract was published for this record.Citations in this libraryStored only when both papers are in the corpus — 103 citations exist upstream.References1891The Principles of Psychology1964ASPECTS OF THE THEORY OF SYNTAX1996Using Language1996Using language: Communicative acts1995The encyclopedia of language and linguistics . Editor-in-Chief: R. E. Asher, Co-ordinating Editor: J. M. Y. Simpson Oxford & New York: Pergamon Press, 1994. 10 volumes. Pp. xlvii, 5644. $2975.00.2002Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking1959Hesitation Phenomena in Spontaneous English Speech1996Reporting on Talk: The Use of Direct Reported Speech in ConversationCited by2015Fluency and Disfluency2018Fluency Bank: A new resource for fluency research and practice2007Hesitation Markers in English, German, and Dutch2014Interjections2012Disfluency in dialogue: an intentional signal from the speaker?2021The dual status of filled pauses: Evidence from genre, proficiency and co-occurrence2017From pause to word:uh, umanderin written American English2022We, um, have, like, a problem: excessive use of fillers in scientific speech