References

• 2003Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses63,086 cited
• 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.44,857 cited
• 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement37,549 cited
• 2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration28,094 cited
• 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
• 2009Introduction to Meta‐Analysis14,215 cited
• 2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration10,345 cited
• 2021Introduction to Meta‐Analysis9,785 cited
• 2000Practical Meta-Analysis9,196 cited
• 1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
• 1976Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research4,889 cited
• 2007Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews4,376 cited
• 2002How should meta‐regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted?3,021 cited
• 2008Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study