SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Pleasing both authors and readers
1 references·8 citing·30 second hop
Pleasing both authors and readers (1999)Pleasing both authors and readersImproving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Improving the quality of repo…The new American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 5 years later: looking back and moving forward (2012)The new American Journal of O…The Use of the World Wide Web by Medical Journals in 2003 and 2005: An Observational Study (2007)The Use of the World Wide Web…Suggestions for Improving the Reporting of Clinical Research: The Role of Narrative (2005)Suggestions for Improving the…The BMJ: moving on (2002)The BMJ: moving onMaking research papers in the BMJ more accessible (2002)Making research papers in the…Using Systematic Reviews and Registers of Ongoing Trials for Scientific and Ethical Trial Design, Monitoring, and Reporting (2001)Using Systematic Reviews and …Physician opinion about electronic publications (2001)Physician opinion about elect…The role of electronic journals in reducing publication bias (1999)The role of electronic journa…Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)meta-analysis bias in location and selection of studies (1998)Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)Publication of clinical trials: accountability and accessibility (2004)Is the information of systematic reviews published in nursing journals up-to-date? a cross-sectional study (2017)From registration to publication: A study on Dutch academic randomized controlled trials (2019)Reliable Knowledge: An Exploration of the Grounds for Belief in Science (1980)Why PLoS Became a Publisher (2003)Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)The BMJ 's website scales up (1998)Taking the American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology into the 21st century (2007)The relationship between a reviewer’s recommendation and editorial decision of manuscripts submitted for publication in obstetrics (2014)The case for structuring the discussion of scientific papers (1999)Why submit your research to the BMJ ? (2007)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Reporting Guidelines (2012)The Internet and theJournal (1995)Information Economics and the Internet (2000)The impact of preprint servers and electronic publishing on biomedical research (2000)The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence (1990)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews (1994)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited

Cited by

  • 2005Suggestions for Improving the Reporting of Clinical Research: The Role of Narrative42 cited
  • 2001Using Systematic Reviews and Registers of Ongoing Trials for Scientific and Ethical Trial Design, Monitoring, and Reporting35 cited
  • 2012The new American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 5 years later: looking back and moving forward29 cited
  • 1999The role of electronic journals in reducing publication bias21 cited
  • 2001Physician opinion about electronic publications16 cited
  • 2002The BMJ: moving on16 cited
  • 2007The Use of the World Wide Web by Medical Journals in 2003 and 2005: An Observational Study15 cited
  • 2002Making research papers in the BMJ more accessible10 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work