Article2013

Theoretical triangulation and pluralism in research methods in organizational and accounting research

Zahirul Hoque · Mark A. Covaleski · Tharusha N. Gooneratne

156 citations0/0 files storedAccounting Auditing & Accountability Journal

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

Business Strategies and Management Research Accounting and Organizational Management Business and Management Studies

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to present a critical review of the contributions of multiple theories to accounting and organizational research, which is often referred to as “theoretical triangulation” or “theoretical pluralism”, with a particular focus on the manner in which chosen research methods have informed these efforts at theoretical triangulation.

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 156 citations exist upstream.

References

1984Case Study Research: Design and Methods 1994Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook 1979The Social Psychology of Organizations.1990Basics of qualitative research 1959The Science of "Muddling Through"1979Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action 1991Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes 1991STRATEGIC RESPONSES TO INSTITUTIONAL PROCESSES

Cited by

2023Determinants of environmental, social, and governance disclosure: A systematic literature review 2020A sticky chocolate problem: Impression management and counter accounts in the shaping of corporate image 2024The Role of Triangulation in Qualitative Research 2023Organizational sustainability schemes align with weak sustainability 2015Making institutional accounting research critical: dead end or new beginning?2020The impact of public sector scorecard adoption on the effectiveness of accounting information systems towards the sustainable performance in public sector

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.