Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

From the Editor—Multiattribute and Intertemporal Preferences, Probability, and Stochastic Processes: Models and Assessment

16 references·3 citing·50 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2000Short-Term Variations and Long-Term Dynamics in Commodity Prices1,098 cited
1987Risk aversion in the theory of expected utility with rank dependent probabilities430 cited
2005Using Binomial Decision Trees to Solve Real-Option Valuation Problems246 cited
2005Alternative Approaches for Solving Real-Options Problems148 cited
1986Empirical tests of weighted utility theory135 cited
1989A unifying approach to axiomatic non-expected utility theories101 cited
2005Attribute Dominance Utility100 cited
2008A Comparison of Two Probability Encoding Methods: Fixed Probability vs. Fixed Variable Values71 cited
1994Choquet Expected Utility with a Finite State Space: Commutativity and Act-Independence68 cited
2010The Role of Some Functional Equations in Decision Analysis64 cited
2002Valuing Environmental Outcomes: Preferences for Constant or Improving Sequences61 cited
2008Eliciting Subjective Probabilities Through Exchangeable Events: An Advantage and a Limitation61 cited
2007Invariant Utility Functions and Certain Equivalent Transformations38 cited
2010Scoring Rules and Decision Analysis Education32 cited
2010Bivariate Stochastic Dominance and Substitute Risk-(In)dependent Utilities

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

25 cited

2010Measuring Risk Aversion in a Name-Your-Own-Price Channel21 cited

Cited by

2020Using Expert Elicitation to Build Long-Term Projection Assumptions16 cited
2012From the Editors—Brainstorming, Multiplicative Utilities, Partial Information on Probabilities or Outcomes, and Regulatory Focus3 cited
2011From the Editors—Probability Scoring Rules, Ambiguity, Multiattribute Terrorist Utility, and Sensitivity Analysis3 cited