References

• 1963Little Science, Big Science4,272 cited
• 1997Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research2,444 cited
• 1926The frequency distribution of scientific productivity2,266 cited
• 1997The Scientific Wealth of Nations596 cited
• 1996Fortnightly Review: How can impact factors be improved?484 cited
• 1999Evaluación de la actividad científica a través de indicadores bibliométricos298 cited
• 1997Journal accused of manipulating impact factor152 cited
• 1995Impact factor as a misleading tool in evaluation of medical journals119 cited
• 1992[Bibliometric indicators and the evaluation of medical scientific activity. (III). The indicators of information production, circulation and dispersion, consumption and the repercussions].109 cited
• 1997[Impactolatry: diagnosis and treatment].105 cited
• 1992[Bibliometric indicators and evaluation of the medico-scientific activity. IV. Application of the indicators].85 cited
• 1997[Spanish scientific production in biomedicine and health sciences during the period 1990-1993 (Science Citation Index and Social Science Citation Index) and comparison to period 1986-1989].77 cited
• 1977Citation Analysis: Queries and Caveats70 cited
• 1995Impact factor as the best operational measure of medical journals60 cited