SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Study Designs and Systematic Reviews of Interventions: Building Evidence Across Study Designs
7 references·5 citing·45 second hop
Study Designs and Systematic Reviews of Interventions: Building Evidence Across Study Designs (2014)Study Designs and Systematic Reviews of I…Observational Research Methods (2017)Observational Research MethodsApplication of systematic review methodology to food and feed safety assessments to support decision making (2010)Application of systematic rev…External validity of randomised controlled trials: “To whom do the results of this trial apply?” (2005)External validity of randomis…Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma related to gravitational challenge: systematic review of randomised controlled trials (2003)Parachute use to prevent deat…Systematic Reviews in Health Care (2001)Systematic Reviews in Health …Physician Interpretations and Textbook Definitions of Blinding Terminology in Randomized Controlled Trials (2001)Physician Interpretations and…Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Assessing the quality of cont…The standards of reporting randomized trials in pets (PetSORT): Methods and development processes (2023)The standards of reporting ra…Levels of Evidence, Quality Assessment, and Risk of Bias: Evaluating the Internal Validity of Primary Research (2022)Levels of Evidence, Quality A…Unbiased Approaches for Reviewing Entomology Literature: A Systematized Review (2020)Unbiased Approaches for Revie…Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in animal health, performance, and on-farm food safety: a scoping review (2019)Systematic reviews and meta-a…Research synthesis in veterinary science: Narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analysis (2015)Research synthesis in veterin…The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)On the benefits of systematic reviews for wildlife parasitology (2016)Using campaigns to improve perceptions of the value of adult vaccination in the United States: Health communication considerations and insights (2017)Development of an efficient search filter to retrieve systematic reviews from PubMed (2021)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Extending the CONSORT Statement to Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatment: Explanation and Elaboration (2008)The Role of Behavioral Science Theory in Development and Implementation of Public Health Interventions (2010)CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2011)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)THE QUALITY OF REPORTING OF RANDOMIZED TRIALS IN THE JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY FROM 1988 THROUGH 2000 (2002)Turning a blind eye: the success of blinding reported in a random sample of randomised, placebo controlled trials (2004)The quality of randomized trial reporting in leading medical journals since the revised CONSORT statement (2005)The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews (2003)Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)11 Evidence in Management and Organizational Science: Assembling the Field’s Full Weight of Scientific Knowledge Through Syntheses (2008)Why We Need Qualitative Research in Suicidology (2010)Hypnotics' association with mortality or cancer: a matched cohort study (2012)Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)How should meta‐regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted? (2002)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Systematic Review and Evidence Integration for Literature-Based Environmental Health Science Assessments (2014)Online tools supporting the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and systematic maps: a case study on CADIMA and review of existing tools (2018)Searching for and selecting studies (2019)Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework (2005)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)Completeness of reporting of systematic reviews in the animal health literature: A meta-research study (2021)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)A review of public opinion towards alcohol controls in Australia (2011)Methodological quality assessment tools of non-experimental studies : a systematic review (2012)Do institutions matter in neighbourhood commons governance? A two-stage relationship between diverse property-rights structure and residential public open space (POS) quality: Kota Kinabalu and Penampang, Sabah, Malaysia (2016)Associations between job burnout and self-efficacy: a meta-analysis (2015)Risk factors for persistent delinquent behavior among juveniles: A meta-analytic review (2015)Perceived barriers and facilitators towards help‐seeking for eating disorders: A systematic review (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2001Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials3,309 cited
  • 2005External validity of randomised controlled trials: “To whom do the results of this trial apply?”2,541 cited
  • 2003Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma related to gravitational challenge: systematic review of randomised controlled trials1,155 cited
  • 2010Application of systematic review methodology to food and feed safety assessments to support decision making695 cited
  • 2001Systematic Reviews in Health Care269 cited
  • 2001Physician Interpretations and Textbook Definitions of Blinding Terminology in Randomized Controlled Trials256 cited
  • 2017Observational Research Methods212 cited

Cited by

  • 2015Research synthesis in veterinary science: Narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analysis39 cited
  • 2022Levels of Evidence, Quality Assessment, and Risk of Bias: Evaluating the Internal Validity of Primary Research34 cited
  • 2019Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in animal health, performance, and on-farm food safety: a scoping review15 cited
  • 2023The standards of reporting randomized trials in pets (PetSORT): Methods and development processes13 cited
  • 2020Unbiased Approaches for Reviewing Entomology Literature: A Systematized Review13 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work