SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Predatory journals and their article publishing charges
5 references·16 citing·35 second hop
Predatory journals and their article publishing charges (2014)Predatory journals and their article publ…Who publishes in “predatory” journals? (2014)Who publishes in “predatory” …Who's Afraid of Peer Review? (2013)Who's Afraid of Peer Review?Predatory publishers are corrupting open access (2012)Predatory publishers are corr…A study of open access journals using article processing charges (2012)A study of open access journa…“Predatory” Open-Access Scholarly Publishers (2010)“Predatory” Open-Access Schol…Analysis of publications by authors of Ukrainian institutes in Scopus‐delisted titles (2022)Analysis of publications by a…Predatory publishing in management research: A call for open peer review (2019)Predatory publishing in manag…Biomedical researchers and students knowledge about predatory journals (2019)Biomedical researchers and st…Academics and the Field of Academic Publishing: Challenges and Approaches (2019)Academics and the Field of Ac…Scholarly databases under scrutiny (2018)Scholarly databases under scr…Publishing in predatory tourism and hospitality journals: Mapping the academic market and identifying response strategies (2018)Publishing in predatory touri…Predatory Publishing in Orthopaedic Research (2018)Predatory Publishing in Ortho…Economists behaving badly: publications in predatory journals (2018)Economists behaving badly: pu…Who is Actually Harmed by Predatory Publishers? (2017)Who is Actually Harmed by Pre…The extent of South African authored articles in predatory journals (2017)The extent of South African a…Predatory journals and dishonesty in science (2017)Predatory journals and dishon…Open Access: Concepts, findings, and recommendations for stakeholders in dentistry (2017)Open Access: Concepts, findin…Is Predatory Publishing a Real Threat? Evidence from a Large Database Study (2017)Is Predatory Publishing a Rea…Beware of the predatory science journal: A potential threat to the integrity of medical research (2017)Beware of the predatory scien…The forensic implications of predatory publishing (2016)The forensic implications of …The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)The academic, economic and so…Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Bias in peer review (2012)Predatory journals recruit fake editor (2017)Self-citations as strategic response to the use of metrics for career decisions (2017)Predatory journals: Who publishes in them and why? (2018)The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009 (2011)Anatomy of open access publishing: a study of longitudinal development and internal structure (2012)Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientific impact (2012)‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics (2015)Identifying publications in questionable journals in the context of performance-based research funding (2019)The storm around Beall’s List: a review of issues raised by Beall’s critics over his criteria of identifying predatory journals and publishers (2019)Can we automate expert-based journal rankings? Analysis of the Finnish publication indicator (2020)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)The Economic Impacts of Open Science: A Rapid Evidence Assessment (2019)Measuring open access publications: a novel normalized open access indicator (2020)Up Front and Open? Shrouded in Secrecy? Or Somewhere in Between? A Meta-Research Systematic Review of Open Science Practices in Sport Medicine Research (2023)Open access: The true cost of science publishing (2013)Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? (2013)Predatory journals and conferences: why fake counts (2019)Reliability of the PEDro scale: comparison between trials published in predatory and non-predatory journals (2022)Predatory journals: Perception, impact and use of Beall’s list by the scientific community–A bibliometric big data study (2023)Predatory publications in evidence syntheses (2019)Beall's legacy in the battle against predatory publishers (2021)Prevalence of potentially predatory publishing in Scopus on the country level (2021)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)Sample Selection in Systematic Literature Reviews of Management Research (2021)How to Make More Published Research True (2014)How open science helps researchers succeed (2016)Revisiting the Term Predatory Open Access Publishing (2019)Understanding Higher Education: Alternative Perspectives (2021)Profile of authors publishing in ‘predatory’ journals and causal factors behind their decision: A systematic review (2021)RETRACTED ARTICLE: Predatory publishing in Scopus: evidence on cross-country differences (2021)Predatory publishing in Scopus: Evidence on cross-country differences (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2012Predatory publishers are corrupting open access956 cited
  • 2013Who's Afraid of Peer Review?934 cited
  • 2014Who publishes in “predatory” journals?360 cited
  • 2012A study of open access journals using article processing charges358 cited
  • 2010“Predatory” Open-Access Scholarly Publishers89 cited

Cited by

  • 2017The extent of South African authored articles in predatory journals111 cited
  • 2017Is Predatory Publishing a Real Threat? Evidence from a Large Database Study87 cited
  • 2016The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review58 cited
  • 2018Predatory Publishing in Orthopaedic Research56 cited
  • 2018Economists behaving badly: publications in predatory journals53 cited
  • 2019Predatory publishing in management research: A call for open peer review41 cited
  • 2017Who is Actually Harmed by Predatory Publishers?37 cited
  • 2018Scholarly databases under scrutiny36 cited
  • 2017Beware of the predatory science journal: A potential threat to the integrity of medical research33 cited
  • 2018Publishing in predatory tourism and hospitality journals: Mapping the academic market and identifying response strategies

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

32 cited
  • 2022Analysis of publications by authors of Ukrainian institutes in Scopus‐delisted titles32 cited
  • 2019Biomedical researchers and students knowledge about predatory journals25 cited
  • 2017Open Access: Concepts, findings, and recommendations for stakeholders in dentistry24 cited
  • 2017Predatory journals and dishonesty in science21 cited
  • 2019Academics and the Field of Academic Publishing: Challenges and Approaches21 cited
  • 2016The forensic implications of predatory publishing21 cited