Commentators are divided over the cognitive status of Spinoza’s model of human nature: the free man. In this paper I defend an interpretation on which the idea of the free man is an inadequate idea from one perspective and an adequate idea from another. Regarded as the idea of a perfectly free finite thing, the idea of the free man is incoherent and, as a result, inadequate. However, regarded as the idea of the perfection of our nature and power, the idea of the free man is a way of conceiving God and, as a result, an adequate idea.
Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 73 citations exist upstream.