SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Consistency of the Results of Different MCA Methods: A Critical Review
16 references·3 citing·46 second hop
Consistency of the Results of Different MCA Methods: A Critical Review (2006)Consistency of the Results of Different M…On the convergence of multiattribute weighting methods (2001)On the convergence of multiat…Multicriterion Analysis for Sustainable Water Resources Planning: A Case Study in Spain (2000)Multicriterion Analysis for S…Comparison of different multicriteria evaluation methods for the Red Bluff diversion dam (2000)Comparison of different multi…Application of fuzzy measures in multi-criteria evaluation in GIS (2000)Application of fuzzy measures…Validation of multicriteria analysis models (1999)Validation of multicriteria a…Multi-attribute decision making: A simulation comparison of select methods (1998)Multi-attribute decision maki…Comparing multicriteria methods in the context of environmental problems (1998)Comparing multicriteria metho…Attribute weighting methods and decision quality in the presence of response error: a simulation study (1998)Attribute weighting methods a…ELECTRE III and IV Decision Aids in an Environmental Problem (1997)ELECTRE III and IV Decision A…Building public confidence in energy planning: a multimethod MCDM approach to demand-side planning at BC gas (1997)Building public confidence in…Multicriteria methods for resource planning: an experimental comparison (1994)Multicriteria methods for res…Does choice of multicriteria method matter? An experiment in water resources planning (1992)Does choice of multicriteria …Cognitive validity in design of decision‐aiding techniques (1992)Cognitive validity in design …Decision analysis and behavioral research (1986)Decision analysis and behavio…A comparison of the analytic hierarchy process and a simple multi-attribute value function (1986)A comparison of the analytic …How to Use Multiattribute Utility Measurement for Social Decisionmaking (1977)How to Use Multiattribute Uti…RETRACTED ARTICLE: Prescriptive analytics applications in sustainable operations research: conceptual framework and future research challenges (2023)RETRACTED ARTICLE: Prescripti…Comparing multi-criteria decision analysis and integrated assessment to support long-term water supply planning (2017)Comparing multi-criteria deci…Social Multicriteria Evaluation of Conflict over Rural Electrification and Solar Energy in Spain (2008)Social Multicriteria Evaluati…The theory of decision making. (1954)Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. (1984)Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? (2000)Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment (2004)Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method (2014)How to select and how to rank projects: The Promethee method (1986)Multicriterion Decision in Management (2000)Fuzzy TOPSIS Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Applied to Karun Reservoirs System (2010)Multicriterion Decision in Management: Principles and Practice (2011)Comparison of Different Multi Criteria Decision-Making Models in Prioritizing Flood Management Alternatives (2015)ELECTRE Methods (2016)Judgment under Uncertainty (1982)Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. (1994)Causal maps and the evaluation of decision options—a review (2006)Reasoning maps for decision aid: an integrated approach for problem-structuring and multi-criteria evaluation (2007)Theory of games and economic behavior (2019)Advances in Multicriteria Analysis (1995)A new method for group decision support based on ELECTRE III methodology (2003)Evaluating sustainable fishing development strategies using fuzzy MCDM approach (2004)Selecting an Appropriate Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Technique for Renewable Energy Planning (2006)Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications (1981)Multicriteria evaluation for urban and regional planning (1982)Remarks on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (1990)Fuzzy TOPSIS method based on alpha level sets with an application to bridge risk assessment (2005)A NEW ADDITIVE RATIO ASSESSMENT (ARAS) METHOD IN MULTICRITERIA DECISION‐MAKING / NAUJAS ADITYVINIS KRITERIJŲ SANTYKIŲ ĮVERTINIMO METODAS (ARAS) DAUGIAKRITERINIAMS UŽDAVINIAMS SPRĘSTI (2010)A fuzzy multi criteria approach for measuring sustainability performance of a supplier based on triple bottom line approach (2012)The Analytic Hierarchy Process (1985)Scale sensitivity in the multiplicative AHP and SMART (1993)An extension of the Electre I method for group decision-making under a fuzzy environment (2010)On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decisionmaking (1988)Integrating multi-criteria evaluation with geographical information systems (1991)Analytical hierarchy process (1994)Ordered weighted averaging with fuzzy quantifiers: GIS-based multicriteria evaluation for land-use suitability analysis (2006)Implementing an extension of the analytical hierarchy process using ordered weighted averaging operators with fuzzy quantifiers in ArcGIS (2007)Integrating multi-criteria evaluation techniques with geographic information systems for landfill site selection: A case study using ordered weighted average (2011)Optimization by the Analytic Hierarchy Process (1979)Supplier selection using a multi-criteria decision aid method (2003)A framework for weighting of criteria in ranking stage of material selection process (2011)A Comprehensive Review of the Novel Weighting Methods for Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (2023)Linear models in decision making. (1974)Tentative guidelines to help choosing an appropriate MCDA method (1998)Comparison of weights in TOPSIS models (2004)Application of multicriteria decision analysis in environmental decision making (2005)Weight approximations in multi‐attribute decision models (2002)A multi-criteria evaluation method for climate change mitigation policy instruments (2007)Transformation effect of resource-based cities based on PSM-DID model: An empirical analysis from China (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1986Decision analysis and behavioral research3,035 cited
  • 1977How to Use Multiattribute Utility Measurement for Social Decisionmaking1,037 cited
  • 1998Multi-attribute decision making: A simulation comparison of select methods1,017 cited
  • 2000Application of fuzzy measures in multi-criteria evaluation in GIS738 cited
  • 1986A comparison of the analytic hierarchy process and a simple multi-attribute value function347 cited
  • 2001On the convergence of multiattribute weighting methods325 cited
  • 1998Comparing multicriteria methods in the context of environmental problems260 cited
  • 1998Attribute weighting methods and decision quality in the presence of response error: a simulation study224 cited
  • 1992Cognitive validity in design of decision‐aiding techniques182 cited
  • 2000Multicriterion Analysis for Sustainable Water Resources Planning: A Case Study in Spain173 cited
  • 1997Building public confidence in energy planning: a multimethod MCDM approach to demand-side planning at BC gas164 cited
  • 1992Does choice of multicriteria method matter? An experiment in water resources planning144 cited
  • 1994Multicriteria methods for resource planning: an experimental comparison127 cited
  • 1999Validation of multicriteria analysis models119 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

1997
ELECTRE III and IV Decision Aids in an Environmental Problem
100 cited
  • 2000Comparison of different multicriteria evaluation methods for the Red Bluff diversion dam99 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2008Social Multicriteria Evaluation of Conflict over Rural Electrification and Solar Energy in Spain33 cited
    • 2017Comparing multi-criteria decision analysis and integrated assessment to support long-term water supply planning31 cited
    • 2023RETRACTED ARTICLE: Prescriptive analytics applications in sustainable operations research: conceptual framework and future research challenges13 cited