SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Evaluating Single-Subject Treatment Research: Lessons Learned from the Aphasia Literature
6 references·16 citing·43 second hop
Evaluating Single-Subject Treatment Research: Lessons Learned from the Aphasia Literature (2006)Evaluating Single-Subject Treatment Resea…What Future Quantitative Social Science Research Could Look Like: Confidence Intervals for Effect Sizes (2002)What Future Quantitative Soci…Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Improving the quality of repo…Practical Significance: A Concept Whose Time Has Come (1996)Practical Significance: A Con…The Handbook of Research Synthesis. (1995)The Handbook of Research Synt…The Handbook of Research Synthesis. (1994)The Handbook of Research Synt…Tactics of Scientific Research (1960)Tactics of Scientific ResearchThe Single-Case Reporting Guideline In BEhavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016: Explanation and elaboration. (2016)The Single-Case Reporting Gui…The Single-Case Reporting Guideline In BEhavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016 Statement (2016)The Single-Case Reporting Gui…The Single-Case Reporting Guideline In BEhavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016 Statement (2016)The Single-Case Reporting Gui…The Single-Case Reporting Guideline In BEhavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016 Statement (2016)The Single-Case Reporting Gui…Recommendations for Choosing Single-Case Data Analytical Techniques (2016)Recommendations for Choosing …Psychological Determinants of Whole-Body Endurance Performance (2015)Psychological Determinants of…Optimising the design of intervention studies: critiques and ways forward (2014)Optimising the design of inte…A Systematic Review of Treatment Outcomes for Children With Childhood Apraxia of Speech (2014)A Systematic Review of Treatm…Revision of a method quality rating scale for single-case experimental designs andn-of-1 trials: The 15-item Risk of Bias inN-of-1 Trials (RoBiNT) Scale (2013)Revision of a method quality …Quality Appraisal of Single-Subject Experimental Designs: An Overview and Comparison of Different Appraisal Tools (2012)Quality Appraisal of Single-S…PND at 25 (2012)PND at 25Feedback Frequency in Treatment for Childhood Apraxia of Speech (2012)Feedback Frequency in Treatme…Random Versus Blocked Practice in Treatment for Childhood Apraxia of Speech (2011)Random Versus Blocked Practic…Evidence-Based Practice for Children With Speech Sound Disorders: Part 1 Narrative Review (2011)Evidence-Based Practice for C…Single-subject designs as a tool for evidence-based clinical practice: Are they unrecognised and undervalued? (2009)Single-subject designs as a t…Rating the methodological quality of single-subject designs andn-of-1 trials: Introducing the Single-Case Experimental Design (SCED) Scale (2008)Rating the methodological qua…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Motor-Based Intervention Protocols in Treatment of Childhood Apraxia of Speech (CAS) (2014)A Randomized Controlled Trial for Children With Childhood Apraxia of Speech Comparing Rapid Syllable Transition Treatment and the Nuffield Dyspraxia Programme–Third Edition (2015)How Young Children Learn Language and Speech (2019)Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. (1994)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2010)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT extension for reporting N-of-1 trials (CENT) 2015 Statement (2015)Single-case experimental designs to assess intervention effectiveness in rehabilitation: A practical guide (2017)Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research (1963)Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. (1982)Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide (2006)Effects of Psychological and Psychosocial Interventions on Sport Performance: A Meta-Analysis (2016)Thinking and Action: A Cognitive Perspective on Self-Regulation during Endurance Performance (2016)The Science of Racing against Opponents: Affordance Competition and the Regulation of Exercise Intensity in Head-to-Head Competition (2017)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Best practice for motor imagery: a systematic literature review on motor imagery training elements in five different disciplines (2011)Single-case experimental designs: A systematic review of published research and current standards. (2012)Rank Correlation Methods. (1957)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)A power primer. (1992)Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. (1999)A farewell to Bonferroni: the problems of low statistical power and publication bias (2004)Understanding the New Statistics: Effect Sizes, Confidence Intervals, and Meta-Analysis (2011)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)The earth is round (p < .05). (1994)Best Practices in Exploratory Factor Analysis (2008)Un sistema de clasificación de los diseños de investigación en psicología (2013)Meta-evaluation of meta-analysis: ten appraisal questions for biologists (2017)Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2000)Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence. (2003)Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)Children of divorce in the 1990s: An update of the Amato and Keith (1991) meta-analysis. (2001)Effectiveness of Mentoring Programs for Youth: A Meta‐Analytic Review (2002)A meta-analytic review of work–family conflict and its antecedents (2005)SOME CURRENT DIMENSIONS OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS1 (1968)Statistical significance in psychological research. (1968)TOWARD A FUNCTIONAL ANALYSIS OF SELF‐INJURY (1994)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement4,828 cited
  • 1995The Handbook of Research Synthesis.3,643 cited
  • 1994The Handbook of Research Synthesis.1,868 cited
  • 1996Practical Significance: A Concept Whose Time Has Come1,774 cited
  • 1960Tactics of Scientific Research1,642 cited
  • 2002What Future Quantitative Social Science Research Could Look Like: Confidence Intervals for Effect Sizes539 cited

Cited by

  • 2008Rating the methodological quality of single-subject designs andn-of-1 trials: Introducing the Single-Case Experimental Design (SCED) Scale362 cited
  • 2013Revision of a method quality rating scale for single-case experimental designs andn-of-1 trials: The 15-item Risk of Bias inN-of-1 Trials (RoBiNT) Scale356 cited
  • 2015Psychological Determinants of Whole-Body Endurance Performance291 cited
  • 2014A Systematic Review of Treatment Outcomes for Children With Childhood Apraxia of Speech226 cited
  • 2016The Single-Case Reporting Guideline In BEhavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016: Explanation and elaboration.219 cited
  • 2012PND at 25219 cited
  • 2016The Single-Case Reporting Guideline In BEhavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016 Statement189 cited
  • 2011Evidence-Based Practice for Children With Speech Sound Disorders: Part 1 Narrative Review

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

171 cited
  • 2009Single-subject designs as a tool for evidence-based clinical practice: Are they unrecognised and undervalued?170 cited
  • 2016The Single-Case Reporting Guideline In BEhavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016 Statement147 cited
  • 2011Random Versus Blocked Practice in Treatment for Childhood Apraxia of Speech133 cited
  • 2016Recommendations for Choosing Single-Case Data Analytical Techniques124 cited
  • 2014Optimising the design of intervention studies: critiques and ways forward114 cited
  • 2012Feedback Frequency in Treatment for Childhood Apraxia of Speech109 cited
  • 2012Quality Appraisal of Single-Subject Experimental Designs: An Overview and Comparison of Different Appraisal Tools108 cited
  • 2016The Single-Case Reporting Guideline In BEhavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016 Statement106 cited