Article2005

Is It Time to Replace the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale as the Primary Outcome Measure in Treatment Studies of Depression?

Mark A. Zimmerman · Michael A. Posternak · Iwona Chelminski

58 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Clinical Psychopharmacology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes Treatment of Major Depression Psychological Testing and Assessment

Abstract

Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Brown University School of Medicine, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI. Address correspondence and reprint requests to Mark Zimmerman, MD, Bayside Medical Center, 235 Plain Street, Providence, RI 02905. E-mail: [email protected].

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 58 citations exist upstream.

References

1960A RATING SCALE FOR DEPRESSION 1979A New Depression Scale Designed to be Sensitive to Change 1965A Self-Rating Depression Scale 1967Development of a Rating Scale for Primary Depressive Illness 1996The Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS): psychometric properties 1988A Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 2000Symptom Reduction and Suicide Risk in Patients Treated With Placebo in Antidepressant Clinical Trials 1973Depression Rating Scales

Cited by

2007Sensitivity to change, discriminative performance, and cutoff criteria to define remission for embedded short scales of the Hamilton depression rating scale (HAMD)

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.