SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
What may alter the conclusions of reviews?
9 references·1 citing·46 second hop
What may alter the conclusions of reviews? (1998)What may alter the conclusions of reviews?How to read a paper: Papers that summarise other papers (systematic reviews and meta-analyses) (1997)How to read a paper: Papers t…Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Bias in meta-analysis detecte…Methodology of systematic reviews: an introduction (1996)Methodology of systematic rev…Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists (1995)Assessing the quality of rand…Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Systematic Reviews: Identifyi…Systematic Reviews: Checklists for review articles (1994)Systematic Reviews: Checklist…Can meta-analyses be trusted? (1991)Can meta-analyses be trusted?An empirical study of the possible relation of treatment differences to quality scores in controlled randomized clinical trials (1990)An empirical study of the pos…A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial (1981)A method for assessing the qu…Can Cochrane Reviews in Controversial Areas Be Biased? A Sensitivity Analysis Based on the Protocol of a Systematic Cochrane Review on Low-Level Laser Therapy in Osteoarthritis (2005)Can Cochrane Reviews in Contr…The Handbook of Research Synthesis. (1994)The Handbook of Research Synthesis. (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Methodological quality of a systematic review on physical therapy for temporomandibular disorders: influence of hand search and quality scales (2010)Mindfulness meditation practise as a healthcare intervention: A systematic review (2010)Meta-analysis in social research (1982)Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF): properties and frontier of current knowledge (2010)Burnout in university teaching staff: a systematic literature review (2011)How to Read a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis and Apply the Results to Patient Care (2014)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Excess mortality of mental disorder (1998)The association between obesity and anxiety disorders in the population: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2009)Dictator games: a meta study (2011)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)More Informative Abstracts Revisited (1990)How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study (2003)Guidelines for Systematic Review in Conservation and Environmental Management (2006)Sex Differences in Insomnia: A Meta-Analysis (2006)Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. A meta-analysis (1994)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed (2005)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. (1986)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Heterogeneity in Meta-analysis of Data from Epidemiologic Studies: A Commentary (1995)Impact of Study Quality on Outcome in Placebo-Controlled Trials of Homeopathy (1999)Assessing the Quality of Randomised Controlled Trials (2001)How objective are systematic reviews? Differences between reviews on complementary medicine (2003)Reliability of the PEDro Scale for Rating Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials (2003)An empirical investigation of the potential impact of selective inclusion of results in systematic reviews of interventions: study protocol (2013)Yet another problem with systematic reviews: a living review update (2024)STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT (1986)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)The cochrane database of systematic reviews (1996)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)The Medical Review Article: State of the Science (1987)A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction (1992)Systematic Review: Why sources of heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be investigated (1994)Understanding randomised controlled trials (2005)When is PBL More Effective? A Meta-synthesis of Meta-analyses Comparing PBL to Conventional Classrooms (2009)Meta-analysis of data from animal studies: A practical guide (2013)Review papers : The statistical basis of meta-analysis (1993)A meta-analysis of the impact of short-term sleep deprivation on cognitive variables. (2010)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1997Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test56,637 cited
  • 1994Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews2,256 cited
  • 1981A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial1,349 cited
  • 1995Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists1,306 cited
  • 1997How to read a paper: Papers that summarise other papers (systematic reviews and meta-analyses)575 cited
  • 1991Can meta-analyses be trusted?489 cited
  • 1994Systematic Reviews: Checklists for review articles480 cited
  • 1990An empirical study of the possible relation of treatment differences to quality scores in controlled randomized clinical trials241 cited
  • 1996Methodology of systematic reviews: an introduction32 cited

Cited by

  • 2005Can Cochrane Reviews in Controversial Areas Be Biased? A Sensitivity Analysis Based on the Protocol of a Systematic Cochrane Review on Low-Level Laser Therapy in Osteoarthritis25 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work