SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
If authors became contributors, everyone would gain, especially the reader.
8 references·4 citing·42 second hop
If authors became contributors, everyone would gain, especially the reader. (1998)If authors became contributors, everyone …When authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountable (1997)When authorship fails. A prop…When Authorship Fails (1997)When Authorship FailsUniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals (1997)Uniform Requirements for Manu…The signature of responsibility (1997)The signature of responsibili…Authorship: time for a paradigm shift? (1997)Authorship: time for a paradi…Authors and authorship--reform or abolition? (1997)Authors and authorship--refor…Authorship! Authorship! (1994)Authorship! Authorship!Authorship! Authorship! Guests, ghosts, grafters, and the two-sided coin (1994)Authorship! Authorship! Guest…Measuring dissatisfaction with coauthorship: An empirical approach based on the researchers’ perception (2019)Measuring dissatisfaction wit…Being metric-wise: Heterogeneity in bibliometric knowledge (2017)Being metric-wise: Heterogene…Scientific dishonesty: European reflections (2001)Scientific dishonesty: Europe…Annotation: new rules for authorship in the journal: your contributions are recognized--and published! (1998)Annotation: new rules for aut…The Contributions of Authors to Multiauthored Biomedical Research Papers (1994)Ethical issues in biomedical research: Perceptions and practices of postdoctoral research fellows responding to a survey (1996)The vexed question of authorship: views of researchers in a British medical faculty (1997)How the tobacco industry responded to an influential study of the health effects of secondhand smoke (2002)Authorship in a small medical journal: A study of contributorship statements by corresponding authors (2004)The Ethical Assignment of Authorship in Scientific Publications: Issues and Guidelines (2008)Priorities in Scientific Discovery: A Chapter in the Sociology of Science (1957)Separating authorship responsibility and authorship credit: a proposal for biomedical journals. (1998)La revisión por pares: ¿buena, mala o todo contrario? (2001)Who Wrote This Paper? Basics of Authorship and Ethical Issues (2004)Little Science, Big Science (1963)Prevalence of Articles With Honorary Authors and Ghost Authors in Peer-Reviewed Medical Journals (1998)Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? (2001)Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey (2011)Guidelines on Authorship of Medical Papers (1986)The Order of Authorship: Who's on First? (1990)Unethical practices in authorship of scientific papers (2003)Scientific authorship (2004)Authorship ethics in global health research partnerships between researchers from low or middle income countries and high income countries (2014)Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals (1997)Stigmatization of anorexia nervosa (2006)How to handle authorship disputes: a guide for new researchers (2009)“Equal” Contributions and Credit: An Emerging Trend in the Characterization of Authorship (2010)The Hawthorne effect: A reconsideration of the methodological artifact. (1984)Extrinsic Rewards and Intrinsic Motivation in Education: Reconsidered Once Again (2001)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)“When You Use Social Media You Are Not Working”: Barriers for the Use of Metrics in Social Sciences (2019)Does open access citation advantage depend on paper topics? (2019)Conjoint analysis of researchers' hidden preferences for bibliometrics, altmetrics, and usage metrics (2021)The frequency distribution of scientific productivity (1926)What is research collaboration? (1997)Authorship Policies at U.S. Doctoral Universities: A Review and Recommendations for Future Policies (2020)Authorship and Publication Matters: Credit and Credibility (2021)Analysis of duplicated publications in Russian journals (2022)Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy. (2003)Researcher Contributions and Fulfillment of ICMJE Authorship Criteria: Analysis of Author Contribution Lists in Research Articles with Multiple Authors Published inRadiology (2003)Authorship Matrix: A Rational Approach to Quantify Individual Contributions and Responsibilities in Multi-Author Scientific Articles (2013)Authorship Inflation in Medical Publications (2015)Why do Some Countries Publish More Than Others? An International Comparison of Research Funding, English Proficiency and Publication Output in Highly Ranked General Medical Journals (2004)A Systematic Review of Research on the Meaning, Ethics and Practices of Authorship across Scholarly Disciplines (2011)How can we ensure visibility and diversity in research contributions? How the Contributor Role Taxonomy (CRediT) is helping the shift from authorship to contributorship (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1997When authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountable566 cited
  • 1997When Authorship Fails401 cited
  • 1997Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals243 cited
  • 1994Authorship! Authorship! Guests, ghosts, grafters, and the two-sided coin220 cited
  • 1994Authorship! Authorship!165 cited
  • 1997Authorship: time for a paradigm shift?113 cited
  • 1997The signature of responsibility93 cited
  • 1997Authors and authorship--reform or abolition?27 cited

Cited by

  • 2017Being metric-wise: Heterogeneity in bibliometric knowledge30 cited
  • 2019Measuring dissatisfaction with coauthorship: An empirical approach based on the researchers’ perception24 cited
  • 2001Scientific dishonesty: European reflections19 cited
  • 1998Annotation: new rules for authorship in the journal: your contributions are recognized--and published!11 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work