SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Differences in methodological quality between positive and negative published clinical trials
16 references·0 citing·44 second hop
Differences in methodological quality between positive and negative published clinical trials (2014)Differences in methodological quality bet…The reporting of blinding in physical medicine and rehabilitation randomized controlled trials: A systematic review (2013)The reporting of blinding in …An assessment of the quality of rotator cuff randomized controlled trials: utilizing the Jadad score and CONSORT criteria (2013)An assessment of the quality …The effectiveness of therapeutic play, using virtual reality computer games, in promoting the psychological well‐being of children hospitalised with cancer (2011)The effectiveness of therapeu…GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence (2011)GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating t…A randomised controlled trial of the effect of music therapy and verbal relaxation on chemotherapy‐induced anxiety (2011)A randomised controlled trial…Reporting bias in medical research - a narrative review (2010)Reporting bias in medical res…Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results (2009)Publication bias in clinical …Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies (2008)Assessing Risk of Bias in Inc…Blinded trials taken to the test: an analysis of randomized clinical trials that report tests for the success of blinding (2007)Blinded trials taken to the t…Appendix: Jadad Scale for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials (2005)Appendix: Jadad Scale for Rep…Turning a blind eye: the success of blinding reported in a random sample of randomised, placebo controlled trials (2004)Turning a blind eye: the succ…Assessing Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis (2003)Assessing Publication Bias in…Publication Bias in Editorial Decision Making (2002)Publication Bias in Editorial…Journal Prestige, Publication Bias, and Other Characteristics Associated With Citation of Published Studies in Peer-Reviewed Journals (2002)Journal Prestige, Publication…Assessing the Quality of Randomized Trials (1999)Assessing the Quality of Rand…Positive-Outcome Bias and Other Limitations in the Outcome of Research Abstracts Submitted to a Scientific Meeting (1998)Positive-Outcome Bias and Oth…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in included studies (2008)Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study (2008)Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: a comparison of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool: methodological research (2010)GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness (2011)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects (1997)Bias in published cost effectiveness studies: systematic review (2006)Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts (2007)The Empirical Status of Social Learning Theory: A Meta‐Analysis (2009)SELF‐CONTROL AND VICTIMIZATION: A META‐ANALYSIS (2013)The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence (1990)Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Application of systematic review methodology to food and feed safety assessments to support decision making (2010)Stopping Randomized Trials Early for Benefit and Estimation of Treatment Effects Systematic Review and Meta-regression Analysis (2010)Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomised controlled trials: combined analysis of meta-epidemiological studies. (2012)The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)The importance of allocation concealment and patient blinding in osteoarthritis trials: A meta‐epidemiologic study (2009)Improving Methodological Standards in Behavioral Interventions for Cognitive Enhancement (2019)Blinding and expectancy confounds in psychedelic randomized controlled trials (2021)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Publication bias: what is it? How do we measure it? How do we avoid it? (2013)Considering bias and conflicts of interest among the included studies (2019)CONSORT Harms 2022 statement, explanation, and elaboration: updated guideline for the reporting of harms in randomised trials (2023)Physician Interpretations and Textbook Definitions of Blinding Terminology in Randomized Controlled Trials (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)The evolution of evidence hierarchies: what can Bradford Hill's ‘guidelines for causation’ contribute? (2009)Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials (1987)Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Interrater Reliability of the Modified Jadad Quality Scale for Systematic Reviews of Alzheimer’s Disease Drug Trials (2001)Correlation of Quality Measures With Estimates of Treatment Effect in Meta-analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials (2002)Recommendations by Cochrane Review Groups for assessment of the risk of bias in studies (2008)Factors Influencing Publication of Research Results (1992)Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review (2008)Current concepts on bibliometrics: a brief review about impact factor, Eigenfactor score, CiteScore, SCImago Journal Rank, Source-Normalised Impact per Paper, H-index, and alternative metrics (2018)Application of bibliometrics in medicine: a historical bibliometrics analysis (2020)Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases (2010)Publication bias in the social sciences: Unlocking the file drawer (2014)The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis (2019)GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistency (2011)A GRADE Working Group approach for rating the quality of treatment effect estimates from network meta-analysis (2014)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2011GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence8,270 cited
  • 2008Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies3,395 cited
  • 2009Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results897 cited
  • 1999Assessing the Quality of Randomized Trials649 cited
  • 2002Journal Prestige, Publication Bias, and Other Characteristics Associated With Citation of Published Studies in Peer-Reviewed Journals643 cited
  • 2010Reporting bias in medical research - a narrative review452 cited
  • 2002Publication Bias in Editorial Decision Making395 cited
  • 1998Positive-Outcome Bias and Other Limitations in the Outcome of Research Abstracts Submitted to a Scientific Meeting305 cited
  • 2004Turning a blind eye: the success of blinding reported in a random sample of randomised, placebo controlled trials262 cited
  • 2007Blinded trials taken to the test: an analysis of randomized clinical trials that report tests for the success of blinding205 cited
  • 2011The effectiveness of therapeutic play, using virtual reality computer games, in promoting the psychological well‐being of children hospitalised with cancer170 cited
  • 2011A randomised controlled trial of the effect of music therapy and verbal relaxation on chemotherapy‐induced anxiety113 cited
  • 2005Appendix: Jadad Scale for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials107 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2003
Assessing Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis
93 cited
  • 2013An assessment of the quality of rotator cuff randomized controlled trials: utilizing the Jadad score and CONSORT criteria77 cited
  • 2013The reporting of blinding in physical medicine and rehabilitation randomized controlled trials: A systematic review50 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.