Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

A Perspective on Errors, Bias, and Interpretation in the Forensic Sciences and Direction for Continuing Advancement*

6 references·16 citing·46 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1981Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment.2,632 cited
2004Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists566 cited
2005Contextual information renders experts vulnerable to making erroneous identifications482 cited
1991Footwear Impression Evidence: Detection, Recovery and Examination165 cited
2003Context effects in forensic science: A review and application of the science of science to crime laboratory practice in the United States146 cited
2003How the Probability of a False Positive Affects the Value of DNA Evidence142 cited

Cited by

2012Proficiency tests to estimate error rates in the forensic sciences62 cited
2012Dental identification by comparison of antemortem and postmortem dental radiographs: Influence of operator qualifications and cognitive bias53 cited
2019Assessing Cognitive Bias in Forensic Decisions: A Review and Outlook42 cited
2009The utility of dental patterns in forensic dentistry41 cited
2020Implementing blind proficiency testing in forensic laboratories: Motivation, obstacles, and recommendations35 cited
2016A Validation Study of Bullet and Cartridge Case Comparisons Using Samples Representative of Actual Casework32 cited
2020Wrongful convictions and forensic science31 cited
2013

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Practical relevance of pattern uniqueness in forensic science

31 cited

2020ISO-accreditation - is that all there is for forensic science?30 cited

2022Planning, design and logistics of a decision analysis study: The FBI/Ames study involving forensic firearms examiners28 cited

2015Legal versus non-legal approaches to forensic science evidence25 cited

2019How Cross‐Examination on Subjectivity and Bias Affects Jurors’ Evaluations of Forensic Science Evidence23 cited

2019A risk-based approach to cognitive bias in forensic science22 cited

2017Addressing potential observer effects in forensic science: a perspective from a forensic scientist who uses linear sequential unmasking techniques22 cited

2021Ciências forenses: princípios éticos e vieses18 cited

2012Latent print examination and human factors :18 cited