The problem of contemporary analysis in history and psychology

Ivan D. London · Nikolai P. Poltoratzky

3 citations0/0 files storedSystems Research and Behavioral Science

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology Philosophy and History of Science Philosophy, Science, and History

Abstract

An adduction and elucidation relative to the problem, especially as it is involved in contemporary historical analysis of an interdisciplinary character, of the relationships among the scientist-observer and the thing-, or things-, observed as well as the interactions between the scientist-observer and that which is observed and made the bases of theory construction, reveals that the classical nontransactional and nonsituational conception of objectivity must be re-evaluated.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 3 citations exist upstream.

References

1937Causality and Complementarity 1955Historical Inevitability.1932Die Quantenmechanik und die Grundprobleme der Biologie und Psychologie 1951The 'Why' of Man's Experience 1944Psychologists' misuse of the auxiliary concepts of physics and mathematics.1946Some consequences for history and psychology of Langmuir's concept of convergence and divergence of phenomena.1945Psychology and Heisenberg's principle of indeterminacy.1949The Need for Reorientation in Psychology in the Light of Modern Physics

Cited by

1977Convergent and Divergent Amplification and its Meaning for Social Science

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.