Geographic Information Technologies for cultural research: cultural mapping and the prospects of colliding epistemologies

Chris Gibson · Chris Brennan‐Horley · Andrew Warren

33 citations0/0 files storedCultural Trends

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Cultural Industries and Urban Development Geographic Information Systems Studies Urban and sociocultural dynamics

Abstract

This article discusses potential applications of Geographic Information Technologies in cultural research – amidst concern that confusion surrounds what these technologies are, and how they might be used. We discuss the adoption of Geographic Information Technologies in our own cultural research projects, motivated by empirical shortcomings with existing creative industries and cultural planning research methods, coupled with a desire to more fully explore the geography of cultural life within Australian cities. Geographic Information Technologies can comprise a range of technologies (proprietary GIS software systems, GPS, web mapping) that seek to accumulate geographical information for analysis within computer database systems. In our projects, Geographic Information Technologies enabled spatially sensitive questions about creative activity, affective links to city environments and cultural vitality (asked in interviews and focus groups) to be linked to central map databases. “Collisions of epistemologies” (Brown & Knopp, Citation2008) were made possible, dissolving boundaries between qualitative and quantitative methods, and connecting our philosophical commitment to everyday, vernacular forms of culture to matters of cultural planning. Results showed a refreshing amount of creative activity occurring beyond visible “hubs”, in suburbs and the vernacular spaces of everyday life. Moreover, cultural life – and creative activities more specifically – was layered, localized and multifaceted within cities, in ways that preclude singular generalizations. Geographic Information Technologies and maps – with their capacities to capture complexity and layered phenomena – helped communicate such findings in digestible formats, to a range of community and government audiences.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 33 citations exist upstream.

References

2007Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography 1989DECONSTRUCTING THE MAP 1992The power of maps 2002Feminist Visualization: Re-envisioning GIS as a Method in Feminist Geographic Research 1993Writing Worlds: Discourse, Text, and Metaphor in the Representation of Landscape 2008Web Mapping 2.0: The Neogeography of the GeoWeb 2006Critical Issues in Participatory GIS: Deconstructions, Reconstructions, and New Research Directions 2000Trouble in the heartland: GIS and its critics in the 1990s

Cited by

2016The space of conflict: Aboriginal/European interactions and frontier violence on the western Central Murray, South Australia, 1830–41 2020Promoting tangible and intangible hidden cultural heritage: local communities influencing civic decision-making and international cultural policy 2020Geo-Crowdsourcing Contributions for Cultural Mapping 2014Is the concept of the cultural district appropriate for both analysis and policymaking? Two cases in Northern Italy 2023Designing Online Workshops for Teacher Trainees: Heritage Mapping with Web GIS Story Maps

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.