Relative Contributions of Different Sources of Variance to Confidence Ratings

Bo Ekehammar · David Magnusson

0 citations0/0 files storedThe Journal of Psychology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Psychological Testing and Assessment Psychometric Methodologies and Testing Reliability and Agreement in Measurement

Abstract

Summary The relative contributions of different sources of variance to ratings of confidence were studied. Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) stories for 46 male students were rated by four TAT experts with regard to 16 personality variables. The judges gave also a confidence rating for each personality rating. A three-way analysis of variance was applied, and the relative magnitude of the different variance sources was estimated. The main sources (Subjects, Judges, Variables) contributed together only about 10% of the total variance, whereas the different interactions plus the residual accounted for the rest.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 0 citations exist upstream.

References

1954THE PERCEPTION OF PEOPLE 1966Sources of behavioral variance as measured by the S-R Inventory of Anxiousness.1965Generalizability of Scores Influenced by Multiple Sources of Variance 1969Generalizability of contributions from sources of variance in the S-R Inventories of Anxiousness1 1950The prediction of success in the VA training program in clinical psychology.1959A study of ratings based on TAT

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.