A Comparison of Paper‐and‐Pencil and Computer Versions of the Self‐Directed Search

Robert C. Reardon · Teri A. Loughead

21 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Counseling & Development

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Career Development and Diversity Psychometric Methodologies and Testing Psychological Testing and Assessment

Abstract

A study was undertaken to assess the equivalence of the paper‐and‐pencil and computer versions of the Self‐Directed Search (SDS) for 62 college students. The results showed a significant positive correlation in SDS scores for the two SDS forms; however, users strongly preferred the computer format.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 21 citations exist upstream.

References

1980Some diagnostic scales for research in decision making and personality: Identity, information, and barriers.1985The challenge of competence and creativity in computerized psychological testing.1985Comparing computerized versus traditional psychological assessment 1985Assessing the equivalence of paper-and-pencil vs. computerized tests: Demonstration of a promising methodology

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.