SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Replication of the methods section in biosciences papers: is it plagiarism?
9 references·1 citing·34 second hop
Replication of the methods section in biosciences papers: is it plagiarism? (2013)Replication of the methods section in bio…Be careful! Avoiding duplication: a case study (2013)Be careful! Avoiding duplicat…Citation behavior in popular scientific papers: what is behind obscure citations? The case of ethnobotany (2012)Citation behavior in popular …A survey on the use of CrossCheck for detecting plagiarism in journal articles (2012)A survey on the use of CrossC…Checking for plagiarism, duplicate publication, and text recycling (2011)Checking for plagiarism, dupl…Committee on publication ethics (2010)Committee on publication ethi…Chinese journal finds 31% of submissions plagiarized (2010)Chinese journal finds 31% of …Science journal editors’ views on publication ethics: results of an international survey (2009)Science journal editors’ view…CrossCheck: an effective tool for detecting plagiarism (2009)CrossCheck: an effective tool…How to Write the Methods Section of a Research Paper (2004)How to Write the Methods Sect…Detecting and (Not) Dealing with Plagiarism in an Engineering Paper: Beyond CrossCheck—A Case Study (2013)Detecting and (Not) Dealing w…Checking for plagiarism, duplicate publication, and text recycling (2011)The Sickness Impact Profile: Development and Final Revision of a Health Status Measure (1981)Essentials of Writing Biomedical Research Papers (1993)Single case studies vs. multiple case studies: A comparative study (2017)Opening practice: supporting reproducibility and critical spatial data science (2020)Writing a strong scientific paper in medicine and the biomedical sciences: a checklist and recommendations for early career researchers (2021)Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool? (1979)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Citation Advantage of Open Access Articles (2006)Insularity and citation behavior of scientific articles in young fields: the case of ethnobiology (2016)Evaluating Research Impact Based on Semantic Scholar Highly Influential Citations, Total Citations, and Altmetric Attention Scores: The Quest for Refined Measures Remains Illusive (2023)Increased Role of Open Bibliographic Data in the Context of Restricted Access to Proprietary Information Systems (2023)Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta-analysis: a case study (1997)Scientists behaving badly (2005)Requisitos uniformes para manuscritos submetidos a periódicos biomédicos: escrevendo e editando para publicações biomédicas (2006)Authorship and Responsibility in Health Sciences Research: A Review of Procedures for Fairly Allocating Authorship in Multi-Author Studies (2011)Scientists Admitting to Plagiarism: A Meta-analysis of Surveys (2014)The visibility of scientific misconduct: A review of the literature on retracted journal articles (2016)Research Misconduct, Retraction, and Cleansing the Medical Literature: Lessons from the Poehlman Case (2006)Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988–2008 (2011)Journal of Universal Computer Science (2020)Self-Plagiarism or Appropriate Textual Re-use? (2009)Plagiarism in Scientific Publishing (2012)Bilingual (multilingual) publications and duplicate publications: for or against? (2013)The use of text-matching software’s similarity scores (2021)Data falsification and question on academic integrity (2018)Text Recycling in Scientific Writing (2018)Self-plagiarism in academic journal articles: from the perspectives of international editors-in-chief in editorial and COPE case (2020)You Will Be Caught (2011)Perceptions of Chinese Biomedical Researchers Towards Academic Misconduct: A Comparison Between 2015 and 2010 (2017)Retracted publications in the biomedical literature with authors from mainland China (2017)Text-Based Plagiarism in Scientific Publishing: Issues, Developments and Education (2012)Text-Based Plagiarism in Scientific Writing: What Chinese Supervisors Think About Copying and How to Reduce it in Students’ Writing (2012)Plagiarism in submitted manuscripts: incidence, characteristics and optimization of screening—case study in a major specialty medical journal (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2010Committee on publication ethics201 cited
  • 2009Science journal editors’ views on publication ethics: results of an international survey155 cited
  • 2004How to Write the Methods Section of a Research Paper133 cited
  • 2010Chinese journal finds 31% of submissions plagiarized79 cited
  • 2009CrossCheck: an effective tool for detecting plagiarism70 cited
  • 2012A survey on the use of CrossCheck for detecting plagiarism in journal articles45 cited
  • 2012Citation behavior in popular scientific papers: what is behind obscure citations? The case of ethnobotany28 cited
  • 2013Be careful! Avoiding duplication: a case study22 cited
  • 2011Checking for plagiarism, duplicate publication, and text recycling20 cited

Cited by

  • 2013Detecting and (Not) Dealing with Plagiarism in an Engineering Paper: Beyond CrossCheck—A Case Study15 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work