Debunking and the Psychology of Error: A Historical Analysis of Psychological Matters

Abstract

The psychology of the paranormal has always reflected wider themes about the nature and status of psychology. This article, in examining these themes, seeks to show how qualitative research in the history of psychology can contribute to the understanding of psychological topics, ones that have fundamental relevance to the discipline of psychology as a whole. The article examines the construction of psychological expertise by analysing criticisms of unorthodox areas of psychological knowledge. It shows how psychological scientists have long deployed certain rhetorical strategies and that these have been designed not only to reject certain claims but also to construct both their opponents as unscientific and, in the process, themselves as scientific. Furthermore, through the construction and deployment of a psychology of error, critics have warranted both the need and value of psychological explanations for such beliefs and, in the process, constructed the superiority of scientific expertise over public views about psychological matters.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 9 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.