SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Rebooting the CS publication process
12 references·4 citing·39 second hop
Rebooting the CS publication process (2011)Rebooting the CS publication processRevisiting the publication culture in computing research (2010)Revisiting the publication cu…Metrics: Do metrics matter? (2010)Metrics: Do metrics matter?ViewpointTime for computer science to grow up (2009)ViewpointTime for computer sc…ViewpointProgram committee overload in systems (2009)ViewpointProgram committee ov…Diffusion of scientific credits and the ranking of scientists (2009)Diffusion of scientific credi…Bibliometric evaluation of individual researchers: not even right... not even wrong! (2009)Bibliometric evaluation of in…ViewpointScaling the academic publication process to internet scale (2008)ViewpointScaling the academic…The conference reviewing crisis and a proposed solution (2008)The conference reviewing cris…Peer Review Anew: Three Principles and a Case Study in Postpublication Quality Assurance (2008)Peer Review Anew: Three Princ…Publish and perish: why the current publication and review model is killing research and wasting your money (2007)Publish and perish: why the c…Who Should Own Scientific Papers? (1998)Who Should Own Scientific Pap…Protection of information in computer systems (1975)Protection of information in …A survey of accepted authors in computer systems conferences (2020)A survey of accepted authors …Being Reasonable (2015)Being ReasonablePublish now, judge later (2014)Publish now, judge laterFindings and implications from data mining the IMC review process (2012)Findings and implications fro…Conferences vs. journals in computing research (2009)Relationship among research collaboration, number of documents and number of citations: a case study in Spanish computer science production in 2000–2009 (2012)Citation regression analysis of computer science publications in different ranking categories and subfields (2017)Author‐based analysis of conference versus journal publication in computer science (2018)Clio and the Economics of QWERTY (1985)4 What Is Web 2.0? Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software (2012)Scholarly Communication at the University of Namibia: Case study report (2014)What We Still Don't Know About Peer Review (2016)A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review (2017)The Wealth of Networks (2017)Privacy and Freedom (1967)Privacy and Freedom (1970)A calculus for access control in distributed systems (1993)Separation of duty in role-based environments (2002)Linux security modules: general security support for the linux kernel (2004)The Effects of Blinding on Acceptance of Research Papers by Peer Review (1994)Reproducibility of peer review in clinical neuroscience: Is agreement between reviewers any greater than would be expected by chance alone? (2000)Finding scientific gems with Google’s PageRank algorithm (2006)New journal models and publishing perspectives in the evolving digital environment (2010)Designing next-generation platforms for evaluating scientific output: what scientists can learn from the social web (2012)Publish to earn incentives: how do Indonesian professors respond to the new policy? (2018)How popular is your paper? An empirical study of the citation distribution (1998)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact (2008)Metrics: A profusion of measures (2010)Scholarly network similarities: How bibliographic coupling networks, citation networks, cocitation networks, topical networks, coauthorship networks, and coword networks relate to each other (2012)Reputation and impact in academic careers (2014)Creating a global knowledge network (2000)Reforming scholarly publishing and knowledge communication (2005)Scientific Journal Publications (2005)Journals for certification, conferences for rapid dissemination (2011)An Overview of Applications of Proper Scoring Rules (2016)What are the social and scientific benefits of participating at academic conferences? Insights from a survey among doctoral students and postdocs in Germany (2020)Conference reviewing considered harmful (2009)How healthy are software engineering conferences? (2014)A historical dataset of software engineering conferences (2013)Measuring the societal impact of research (2012)Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition (2016)The application of bibliometric analysis: disciplinary and user aspects (2018)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1975Protection of information in computer systems1,419 cited
  • 2009Diffusion of scientific credits and the ranking of scientists323 cited
  • 2010Metrics: Do metrics matter?261 cited
  • 1998Who Should Own Scientific Papers?104 cited
  • 2009ViewpointTime for computer science to grow up67 cited
  • 2008Peer Review Anew: Three Principles and a Case Study in Postpublication Quality Assurance40 cited
  • 2007Publish and perish: why the current publication and review model is killing research and wasting your money35 cited
  • 2009ViewpointProgram committee overload in systems34 cited
  • 2008ViewpointScaling the academic publication process to internet scale29 cited
  • 2010Revisiting the publication culture in computing research25 cited
  • 2009Bibliometric evaluation of individual researchers: not even right... not even wrong!25 cited
  • 2008The conference reviewing crisis and a proposed solution11 cited

Cited by

  • 2015Being Reasonable10 cited
  • 2020A survey of accepted authors in computer systems conferences9 cited
  • 2014Publish now, judge later7 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2012
Findings and implications from data mining the IMC review process
6 cited