Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Does the Committee Peer Review Select the Best Applicants for Funding? An Investigation of the Selection Process for Two European Molecular Biology Organization Programmes

16 references·16 citing·40 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

2005An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output11,612 cited
2007The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge3,605 cited
1984Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R & D Relationship3,391 cited
2008What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior1,598 cited
2000Real science what it is, and what it means763 cited
2007What do we know about the h index?671 cited
1981Chance and Consensus in Peer Review623 cited
2005Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work?398 cited
2004What determines the citation frequency of ecological papers?367 cited
1993Making science: between nature and society359 cited
2005For Your Citations Only? Hot Topics in Bibliometric Analysis281 cited
2001Real Science. What it is, and what it means207 cited
1986Evaluation of some methods for the relative assessment of scientific publications158 cited
2008Prediction of citation counts for clinical articles at two years using data available within three weeks of publication: retrospective cohort study151 cited
2000THE METRICS OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY139 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2006Selecting scientific excellence through committee peer review - A citation analysis of publications previously published to approval or rejection of post-doctoral research fellowship applicants120 cited

Cited by

2009Gender Effects in the Peer Reviews of Grant Proposals: A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Comparing Traditional and Multilevel Approaches174 cited
2012A Reverse Engineering Approach to the Suppression of Citation Biases Reveals Universal Properties of Citation Distributions96 cited
2011How has healthcare research performance been assessed? A systematic review89 cited
2015Early career grants, performance, and careers: A study on predictive validity of grant decisions88 cited
2011A Multilevel Modelling Approach to Investigating the Predictive Validity of Editorial Decisions: Do the Editors of a High Profile Journal Select Manuscripts that are Highly Cited After Publication?82 cited
2009A meta-evaluation of scientific research proposals: Different ways of comparing rejected to awarded applications82 cited
2010The h index research output measurement: Two approaches to enhance its accuracy81 cited
2017Can the journal impact factor be used as a criterion for the selection of junior researchers? A large-scale empirical study based on ResearcherID data79 cited
2012Peer Review of Grant Applications: Criteria Used and Qualitative Study of Reviewer Practices75 cited
n.d.Testing the fairness of citation indicators for comparison across scientific domains: The case of fractional citation counts70 cited
2011Alternatives to Peer Review: Novel Approaches for Research Evaluation68 cited
2011Testing the fairness of citation indicators for comparison across scientific domains: The case of fractional citation counts67 cited
2014The selection of talent as a group process. A literature review on the social dynamics of decision making in grant panels64 cited
2010The predictive validity of peer review: A selective review of the judgmental forecasting qualities of peers, and implications for innovation in science58 cited
2011The Association between Four Citation Metrics and Peer Rankings of Research Influence of Australian Researchers in Six Fields of Public Health53 cited
2013Analysis of bibliometric indicators for individual scholars in a large data set49 cited