SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Who is responsible for investigating suspected research misconduct?
7 references·0 citing·19 second hop
Who is responsible for investigating suspected research misconduct? (2012)Who is responsible for investigating susp…A consensus statement on research misconduct in the UK (2012)A consensus statement on rese…Report finds massive fraud at Dutch universities (2011)Report finds massive fraud at…Coping with scientific misconduct (2011)Coping with scientific miscon…Cancer trial errors revealed (2011)Cancer trial errors revealedThe Costs and Underappreciated Consequences of Research Misconduct: A Case Study (2010)The Costs and Underappreciate…Research misconduct: the poisoning of the well (2006)Research misconduct: the pois…Suspected research fraud: difficulties of getting at the truth (2005)Suspected research fraud: dif…How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Global Research Integrity Training (2013)Research Integrity and Misconduct in the Academic Profession (2013)Heterogeneity in European Research Integrity Guidance (2014)Research Misconduct, Retraction, and Cleansing the Medical Literature: Lessons from the Poehlman Case (2006)Cooperation between research institutions and journals on research integrity cases: Guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) (2012)Cooperation Between Research Institutions and Journals on Research Integrity Cases: Guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) (2012)Is failure to raise concerns about misconduct a breach of integrity? Researchers’ reflections on reporting misconduct (2018)Interventions to prevent misconduct and promote integrity in research and publication (2013)Research Misconduct: The Poisoning of the Well (2006)Publication ethics: Role and responsibility of authors (2021)Towards a Research Agenda for Promoting Responsible Research Practices (2021)Crisis Ahead? Why Human-Robot Interaction User Studies May Have Replicability Problems and Directions for Improvement (2022)The Ethical Assignment of Authorship in Scientific Publications: Issues and Guidelines (2008)Performance Appraisal, Performance Management, and Firm-Level Performance: A Review, a Proposed Model, and New Directions for Future Research (2013)Research misconduct and data fraud in clinical trials: prevalence and causal factors (2015)Rétractations pour erreur et pour fraude (2012)Fraud in scientific research – birth of the Concordat to uphold research integrity in the United Kingdom (2013)Preventing fraud in biomedical research (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005Suspected research fraud: difficulties of getting at the truth125 cited
  • 2006Research misconduct: the poisoning of the well96 cited
  • 2010The Costs and Underappreciated Consequences of Research Misconduct: A Case Study93 cited
  • 2011Report finds massive fraud at Dutch universities80 cited
  • 2011Coping with scientific misconduct39 cited
  • 2011Cancer trial errors revealed27 cited
  • 2012A consensus statement on research misconduct in the UK26 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work