Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The rhetoric of research

4 references·16 citing·44 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1924The Art of Rhetoric549 cited
2003Language, Ideology and Point of View528 cited
2008Rhetoric of Science463 cited
1988A genre-based investigation of the discussion sections in articles and dissertations451 cited

Cited by

2016A new classification of spin in systematic reviews and meta-analyses was developed and ranked according to the severity224 cited
2025CONSORT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials203 cited
2009Mejorar la comunicación de estudios observacionales en epidemiología (STROBE): explicación y elaboración192 cited
2009Evidence-Based Medicine, Systematic Reviews, and Guidelines in Interventional Pain Management: Part 3: Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Randomized Trials191 cited
2008Evidence-Based Medicine, Systematic Reviews, and Guidelines in Interventional Pain Management: Part 6. Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Observational Studies167 cited
2013Overinterpretation and Misreporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies: Evidence of “Spin”158 cited
2015Classification and prevalence of spin in abstracts of non-randomized studies evaluating an intervention137 cited
2009Evidence-Based Medicine, Systematic Reviews, and Guidelines in Interventional Pain Management: Part 4: Observational Studies129 cited
2004Users' guide to detecting misleading claims in clinical research reports

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

106 cited

2019Level and Prevalence of Spin in Published Cardiovascular Randomized Clinical Trial Reports With Statistically Nonsignificant Primary Outcomes94 cited

2019“It is important to reinforce the importance of …”: ‘Hype’ in reports of randomized controlled trials85 cited

2002The Hidden Research Paper75 cited

2013“Spin” in wound care research: the reporting and interpretation of randomized controlled trials with statistically non-significant primary outcome results or unspecified primary outcomes66 cited

2002Language and publication in Cardiovascular Research articles58 cited

2008Content and communication: How can peer review provide helpful feedback about the writing?57 cited

2021The presence and characteristics of ‘spin’ among randomized controlled trial abstracts in orthodontics45 cited