Socioeconomic status and executive function: developmental trajectories and mediation

Daniel A. Hackman, Robert Gallop, Gary W. Evans, Martha J. Farah

2015-02-09articleDevelopmental Science685 citationsclosed

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

Early Childhood Education and Development Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development Cognitive Abilities and Testing

Abstract

Childhood socioeconomic status (SES) predicts executive function (EF), but fundamental aspects of this relation remain unknown: the developmental course of the SES disparity, its continued sensitivity to SES changes during that course, and the features of childhood experience responsible for the SES-EF relation. Regarding course, early disparities would be expected to grow during development if caused by accumulating stressors at a given constant level of SES. Alternatively, they would narrow if schooling partly compensates for the effects of earlier deprivation, allowing lower-SES children to 'catch up'. The potential for later childhood SES change to affect EF is also unknown. Regarding mediating factors, previous analyses produced mixed answers, possibly due to correlation amongst candidate mediators. We address these issues with measures of SES, working memory and planning, along with multiple candidate mediators, from the NICHD Study of Early Childcare (n = 1009). Early family income-to-needs and maternal education predicted planning by first grade, and income-to-needs predicted working memory performance at 54 months. Effects of early SES remained consistent through middle childhood, indicating that the relation between early indicators of SES and EF emerges in childhood and persists without narrowing or widening across early and middle childhood. Changes in family income-to-needs were associated with significant changes in planning and trend-level changes in working memory. Mediation analyses supported the role of early childhood home characteristics in explaining the association between SES and EF, while early childhood maternal sensitivity was specifically implicated in the association between maternal education and planning. Early emerging and persistent SES-related differences in EF, partially explained by characteristics of the home and family environment, are thus a potential source of socioeconomic disparities in achievement and health across development.

Citations in this library

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 685 citations exist upstream.

References

1991The theory of planned behavior

1977The CES-D Scale

2002Socioeconomic Status and Child Development

2003Working memory: looking back and looking forward

2005Socioeconomic Status and Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analytic Review of Research

1998Socioeconomic disadvantage and child development.

1997The Effects of Poverty on Children

1978Assessing the impact of life changes: Development of the Life Experiences Survey.

Cited by

2017A meta‐analysis of the relationship between socioeconomic status and executive function performance among children

2020Socioeconomic status and child psychopathology in the United States: A meta-analysis of population-based studies

2018Executive function and academic achievement: Longitudinal relations from early childhood to adolescence.

2019Burden of Environmental Adversity Associated With Psychopathology, Maturation, and Brain Behavior Parameters in Youths

2017The Classroom as a Developmental Context for Cognitive Development: A Meta-Analysis on the Importance of Teacher–Student Interactions for Children’s Executive Functions

2019Cognitive Stimulation as a Mechanism Linking Socioeconomic Status With Executive Function: A Longitudinal Investigation