SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
An algorithm for automated rating of reviewers
4 references·1 citing·20 second hop
An algorithm for automated rating of reviewers (2001)An algorithm for automated rating of revi…The Market for Evaluations (1999)The Market for EvaluationsOpening up BMJ peer review (1999)Opening up BMJ peer reviewEffect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial (1999)Effect of open peer review on…Trends in Scientific Scholarly Journal Publishing in the United States (1997)Trends in Scientific Scholarl…FOSE: a framework for open science evaluation (2012)FOSE: a framework for open sc…Does Masking Author Identity Improve Peer Review Quality? (1998)Effect of Blinding and Unmasking on the Quality of Peer Review (1998)Making Reviewers Visible (2002)The changing forms and expectations of peer review (2018)Peer Review Bias: A Critical Review (2019)Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again (1982)Nepotism and sexism in peer-review (1997)Effect on the Quality of Peer Review of Blinding Reviewers and Asking Them to Sign Their Reports (1998)The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure (1954)The Problem of Social Cost (1960)COUNTERSPECULATION, AUCTIONS, AND COMPETITIVE SEALED TENDERS (1961)Promotional Chat on the Internet (2006)Learning from the Crowd: Regression Discontinuity Estimates of the Effects of an Online Review Database (2012)Stimulating Online Reviews by Combining Financial Incentives and Social Norms (2016)The Influence of Peer Review on the Research Assessment Exercise (2004)Learning to play the game: Student publishing as an indicator of future scholarly success (2012)Explaining the increase in publication productivity among academic staff: a generational perspective (2015)How open science helps researchers succeed (2016)The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review (2016)Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1999Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial415 cited
  • 1999The Market for Evaluations274 cited
  • 1999Opening up BMJ peer review191 cited
  • 1997Trends in Scientific Scholarly Journal Publishing in the United States94 cited

Cited by

  • 2012FOSE: a framework for open science evaluation15 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work