An analysis of the ghost augment in chiShona

Abstract

There are two positions regarding the augment in chiShona. Doke (1931), Marconnès (1931), Fortune (1955) and Harford (1997) use vowel coalescence as the evidence for the existence of a ‘ghost’ augment (‘augment hypothesis’). They, however, provide no formal analysis. In contrast, Odden (1981) and Myers (1990) explain the same phenomenon as assimilation – an implicit denial of the existence of an augment (‘no augment hypothesis’). This article presents new evidence in support of the ‘augment hypothesis’, provides an Optimality Theory (hereafter OT) analysis and demonstrates that the ‘no augment hypothesis’ is indefensible.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 94 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.