SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Reviewers’ Ratings and Bibliometric Indicators: Hand in Hand When Assessing Over Research Proposals?
16 references·13 citing·40 second hop
Reviewers’ Ratings and Bibliometric Indicators: Hand in Hand When Assessing Over Research Proposals? (2013)Reviewers’ Ratings and Bibliometric Indic…Scientific peer review (2011)Scientific peer reviewWhich scientific elites? On the concentration of research funds, publications and citations (2010)Which scientific elites? On t…Looking for Landmarks: The Role of Expert Review and Bibliometric Analysis in Evaluating Scientific Publication Outputs (2009)Looking for Landmarks: The Ro…h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields (2009)h-Index: A review focused in …Allocative efficiency in public research funding: Can bibliometrics help? (2008)Allocative efficiency in publ…UK Research Assessment Exercises: Informed judgments on research quality or quantity? (2007)UK Research Assessment Exerci…Show me the data (2007)Show me the dataPeer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (2006)Peer Review: A Flawed Process…Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals (2006)Peer review: a flawed process…Selection of research fellowship recipients by committee peer review. Reliability, fairness and predictive validity of Board of Trustees' decisions (2005)Selection of research fellows…Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation (2005)Citation Analysis in Research…Peer reviews and bibliometric indicators: a comparative study at a Norwegian university (2004)Peer reviews and bibliometric…The evolution of research activity in Spain (2002)The evolution of research act…Peer review of grant applications: what do we know? (1998)Peer review of grant applicat…Advanced bibliometric methods as quantitative core of peer review based evaluation and foresight exercises (1996)Advanced bibliometric methods…The skewness of science (1992)The skewness of scienceThe role of non-scientific factors vis-à-vis the quality of publications in determining their scholarly impact (2024)The role of non-scientific fa…Meeting evaluation criteria based on authorship positions by gender, academic age, and research field: the Spanish case (2024)Meeting evaluation criteria b…Mapping human resource management scholarly literature through bibliometric lenses: a case study of library and information science (2023)Mapping human resource manage…Mapping research output on library and information science research domain in South Africa: a bibliometric visualisation (2022)Mapping research output on li…The 100 most cited articles on lung cancer screening: a bibliometric analysis (2021)The 100 most cited articles o…Analyzing the relationship between text features and grants productivity (2021)Analyzing the relationship be…University characteristics and probabilities for funding of proposals in the European Framework Programs (2020)University characteristics an…External Tests of Peer Review Validity Via Impact Measures (2018)External Tests of Peer Review…Toward predicting research proposal success (2017)Toward predicting research pr…An analysis of bibliometric indicators to JCR according to Benford’s law (2016)An analysis of bibliometric i…Peer-Selected “Best Papers”—Are They Really That “Good”? (2015)Peer-Selected “Best Papers”—A…Innovation Suppression and Clique Evolution in Peer-Review-Based, Competitive Research Funding Systems: An Agent-Based Model (2015)Innovation Suppression and Cl…Genetic algorithms and G aussian B ayesian networks to uncover the predictive core set of bibliometric indices (2015)Genetic algorithms and G auss…The Logic of Scientific Discovery. (1960)THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS (1963)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)A review of theory and practice in scientometrics (2015)Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references (2015)The scientific impact of nations (2004)Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research (2005)Do rankings reflect research quality? (2010)Accountability in context: effects of research evaluation systems on publication practices, disciplinary norms, and individual working routines in the faculty of Arts at Uppsala University (2014)Research, teaching and performance evaluation in academia: the salience of quality (2015)The Republic of science (1962)New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: Database description, overview of indicators and first applications (1995)The Republic of Science: Its Political and Economic Theory (2000)The use of bibliometric analysis in research performance assessment and monitoring of interdisciplinary scientific developments (2003)Citation counting, citation ranking, and h ‐index of human‐computer interaction researchers: A comparison of Scopus and Web of Science (2008)Detecting emerging research fronts based on topological measures in citation networks of scientific publications (2008)Journal impact factor: a brief review. (1999)The Impact Factor Game (2006)Article-Level Metrics and the Evolution of Scientific Impact (2009)The Altmetric Score: A New Measure for Article-Level Dissemination and Impact (2015)The Journal Impact Factor: A Brief History, Critique, and Discussion of Adverse Effects (2019)Toward a new economics of science (1994)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Evaluating research: A multidisciplinary approach to assessing research practice and quality (2015)Thinking with indicators. Exploring the epistemic impacts of academic performance indicators in the life sciences (2017)Interpreting Bibliometric Data (2021)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Theory and practise of the g-index (2006)Does the h index have predictive power? (2007)An overview of fuzzy research with bibliometric indicators (2014)25years at Knowledge-Based Systems: A bibliometric analysis (2015)Quantifying the evolution of individual scientific impact (2016)Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar (2007)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories (2019)What is open peer review? A systematic review (2017)Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: a systematic evidence map (2020)Bibliometric Indicators and Analysis of Research Systems (1997)Do open access articles have greater citation impact?A critical review of the literature (2007)Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank (2013)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation1,390 cited
  • 2006Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals868 cited
  • 2009h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields849 cited
  • 2006Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals794 cited
  • 1992The skewness of science713 cited
  • 2011Scientific peer review563 cited
  • 1996Advanced bibliometric methods as quantitative core of peer review based evaluation and foresight exercises383 cited
  • 2007Show me the data279 cited
  • 2002The evolution of research activity in Spain226 cited
  • 2007UK Research Assessment Exercises: Informed judgments on research quality or quantity?183 cited
  • 2004Peer reviews and bibliometric indicators: a comparative study at a Norwegian university177 cited
  • 2008Allocative efficiency in public research funding: Can bibliometrics help?170 cited
  • 2009Looking for Landmarks: The Role of Expert Review and Bibliometric Analysis in Evaluating Scientific Publication Outputs168 cited
  • 1998Peer review of grant applications: what do we know?146 cited
  • 2005Selection of research fellowship recipients by committee peer review. Reliability, fairness and predictive validity of Board of Trustees' decisions

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

125 cited
  • 2010Which scientific elites? On the concentration of research funds, publications and citations103 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2017Toward predicting research proposal success38 cited
    • 2022Mapping research output on library and information science research domain in South Africa: a bibliometric visualisation29 cited
    • 2016An analysis of bibliometric indicators to JCR according to Benford’s law18 cited
    • 2015Genetic algorithms and G aussian B ayesian networks to uncover the predictive core set of bibliometric indices16 cited
    • 2015Innovation Suppression and Clique Evolution in Peer-Review-Based, Competitive Research Funding Systems: An Agent-Based Model14 cited
    • 2015Peer-Selected “Best Papers”—Are They Really That “Good”?14 cited
    • 2021Analyzing the relationship between text features and grants productivity13 cited
    • 2020University characteristics and probabilities for funding of proposals in the European Framework Programs12 cited
    • 2018External Tests of Peer Review Validity Via Impact Measures12 cited
    • 2023Mapping human resource management scholarly literature through bibliometric lenses: a case study of library and information science10 cited
    • 2021The 100 most cited articles on lung cancer screening: a bibliometric analysis9 cited
    • 2024The role of non-scientific factors vis-à-vis the quality of publications in determining their scholarly impact8 cited
    • 2024Meeting evaluation criteria based on authorship positions by gender, academic age, and research field: the Spanish case8 cited