Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

A comparison of patient and general population weightings of EQ‐5D dimensions

13 references·5 citing·44 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1990EuroQol - a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life15,893 cited
1996Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine7,192 cited
2002The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-363,053 cited
2002Multiattribute and Single-Attribute Utility Functions for the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 System1,333 cited
2003Whose quality of life? A commentary exploring discrepancies between health state evaluations of patients and the general public431 cited
1999A review of the use of health status measures in economic evaluation.414 cited
1999Generic and condition-specific outcome measures for people with osteoarthritis of the knee325 cited
2001Introducing economic and quality of life measurements into clinical studies320 cited
1996Using the SF-36 and Euroqol on an elderly population298 cited
2002The role of adaptation to disability and disease in health state valuation: a preliminary normative analysis222 cited
2000Sensitivity and perspective in the valuation of health status: whose values count?214 cited
2005Should Patients Have a Greater Role in Valuing Health States?187 cited
2002Notes on the Use of Data Transformation.131 cited

Cited by

2011A Value Set for the EQ-5D Based on Experienced Health States

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

65 cited

2014RESPONSIVENESS OF THE EQ-5D TO CLINICAL CHANGE: IS THE PATIENT EXPERIENCE ADEQUATELY REPRESENTED?63 cited

2014Experience-based VAS values for EQ-5D-3L health states in a national general population health survey in China61 cited

2017Experience-based utility and own health state valuation for a health state classification system: why and how to do it53 cited

2020Whom should we ask? A systematic literature review of the arguments regarding the most accurate source of information for valuation of health states51 cited