INCOME SMOOTHING AND SELF‐CONTROL: THE CASE OF SCHOOLTEACHERS

Abstract

Approximately one‐half of California's Unified School Districts give teachers a choice of receiving their annual salaries in 10 or 12 monthly payments. Intertemporal utility maximization à la Irving Fisher suggests that they should choose 10 payments and earn interest on their savings. But about 50% of the teachers choose 12 installments, even though when summed over a reasonable period the forgone interest can be considerable. This behavior can be explained by the cost of exercising self‐control and by Laibson's model of hyperbolic discounting. A survey of teachers supports this interpretation. (JEL D91, D12)

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 3 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.