SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Procesos de revisión y de edición en Medicina Clínica
9 references·0 citing·39 second hop
Procesos de revisión y de edición en Medicina Clínica (2005)Procesos de revisión y de edición en Medi…Lista de comprobación (checklist) abreviada para la evaluación de artículos de investigación biomédica básica (2003)Lista de comprobación (checkl…Efecto de la revisión estadística en la calidad de los manuscritos publicados en MEDICINA CLÍNICA: estudio aleatorizado (2003)Efecto de la revisión estadís…Making Reviewers Visible (2002)Making Reviewers VisibleFourth International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication (2002)Fourth International Congress…Effects of Editorial Peer Review (2002)Effects of Editorial Peer Rev…The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revise…The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revise…Manuscript Quality before and after Peer Review and Editing at Annals of Internal Medicine (1994)Manuscript Quality before and…Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Improving the Reporting Quality of Nonrandomized Evaluations of Behavioral and Public Health Interventions: The TREND Statement (2004)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Journal Peer Review (1985)A Difficult Balance: Editorial Peer Review in Medicine (1992)The significance of the peer review process against the background of bias: priority ratings of reviewers and editors and the prediction of citation, the role of geographical bias (2002)Elaboración de directrices para la publicación de investigación biomédica: proceso y fundamento científico (2005)Statistical Reviewers Improve Reporting in Biomedical Articles: A Randomized Trial (2007)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (2000)Guidelines for Statistical Reporting in Articles for Medical Journals (1988)The Philosophical Basis of Peer Review and the Suppression of Innovation (1990)Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists (1995)The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis (1999)Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography (2007)Does Masking Author Identity Improve Peer Review Quality? (1998)Effect on the Quality of Peer Review of Blinding Reviewers and Asking Them to Sign Their Reports (1998)Poor-quality medical research: what can journals do? (2002)Blinding in peer review: the preferences of reviewers for nursing journals (2008)We Have to Break Up (2009)A Reliability-Generalization Study of Journal Peer Reviews: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Inter-Rater Reliability and Its Determinants (2010)Effect of Blinding and Unmasking on the Quality of Peer Review (1998)Peer Review in Health Sciences (1999)Towards the enhancement of quality publication practices in clinical psychological science (2019)Peer Review in 18th-Century Scientific Journalism (1990)Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers'recommendations: a randomised trial (1999)Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies (2007)Quality of reporting of experimental studies in medical education: a systematic review (2007)The effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals (2019)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials5,372 cited
  • 2001The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration3,828 cited
  • 2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials2,754 cited
  • 2002Effects of Editorial Peer Review347 cited
  • 1994Manuscript Quality before and after Peer Review and Editing at Annals of Internal Medicine324 cited
  • 2002Making Reviewers Visible167 cited
  • 2002Fourth International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication75 cited
  • 2003Efecto de la revisión estadística en la calidad de los manuscritos publicados en MEDICINA CLÍNICA: estudio aleatorizado20 cited
  • 2003Lista de comprobación (checklist) abreviada para la evaluación de artículos de investigación biomédica básica12 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work