Human Resources As the Wealth of Nations.

Abstract

ACCORDING to economic doctrine, wealth of nations is measured by income, or more precisely by GPN (gross national product) per capita. A wealthy country is a high income country; advanced nations are by definition those with high GNP per capita; and underdeveloped countries are characterized by very low income per head. Rates of growth, or progress along road of modernization, are most commonly measured by annual increments in national income or product expressed in monetary terms. But should income maximization be supreme or even primary objective of national economic policy? Are not other goals-for example, minimization of unemployment, maximization of education and knowledge, limitation of population growth, or improvement in environment-of equal or greater importance? Perhaps in their devout commitment to GNP as primary measure of progress, econoomists have developed a tunnel vision perspective of modern societies. Although I still belong professionally to the church of economics, I am among a small but growing group which argues that GNP or income as major target of national development should lose its sanctity. 1 The central thesis of this paper is that human resources-not capital, income, or material resources-constitute basis for wealth of nations. Capital and natural resources are passive factors of production; human beings are active agents who accumulate capital, exploit natural resources, build social, economic, and political organizations, and carry forward national development. Clearly, a country which is unable

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 204 citations exist upstream.