SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Sensibilidad al cambio de las medidas de desenlace
10 references·0 citing·39 second hop
Sensibilidad al cambio de las medidas de desenlace (2008)Sensibilidad al cambio de las medidas de …Assessing sensitivity to change: choosing the appropriate change coefficient (2005)Assessing sensitivity to chan…On assessing responsiveness of health-related quality of life instruments: Guidelines for instrument evaluation (2003)On assessing responsiveness o…Many faces of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID): a literature review and directions for future research (2002)Many faces of the minimal cli…Reproducibility and responsiveness of evaluative outcome measures. Theoretical considerations illustrated by an empirical example. (2001)Reproducibility and responsiv…REPRODUCIBILITY AND RESPONSIVENESS OF EVALUATIVE OUTCOME MEASURES (2001)REPRODUCIBILITY AND RESPONSIV…A taxonomy for responsiveness (2001)A taxonomy for responsivenessMethods for assessing responsiveness (2000)Methods for assessing respons…Methodological problems in the retrospective computation of responsiveness to change: The lesson of Cronbach (1997)Methodological problems in th…Health Status Measures: Strategies and Analytic Methods for Assessing Change Scores (1996)Health Status Measures: Strat…Measuring health status: What are the necessary measurement properties? (1992)Measuring health status: What…Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. (1992)The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) (1992)Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life (2003)Disentangling Components of Flexibility via the Hexaflex Model: Development and Validation of the Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (MPFI) (2016)Measuring change over time: Assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments (1987)Determining a minimal important change in a disease-specific quality of life questionnaire (1994)The ???smallest real difference??? as a measure of sensitivity to change: a critical analysis (2003)Psychometric properties of the Fatigue Severity Scale in obese patients (2013)Efficient identification of mental health problems in refugees in Germany: the Refugee Health Screener (2017)Statistical principles in experimental design. (1962)Measurement of health status (1989)Computerized adaptive test for patients with foot or ankle impairments produced valid and responsive measures of function (2008)Computerized adaptive test for patients with knee impairments produced valid and responsive measures of function (2008)Clinical Interpretation of a Lower-Extremity Functional Scale–Derived Computerized Adaptive Test (2009)The two disciplines of scientific psychology. (1957)Further Evidence Supporting an SEM-Based Criterion for Identifying Meaningful Intra-Individual Changes in Health-Related Quality of Life (1999)Is a single-item visual analogue scale as valid, reliable and responsive as multi-item scales in measuring quality of life? (2004)Estimation of minimally important differences in EQ-5D utility and VAS scores in cancer (2007)Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. (1991)Assessment of Quality-of-Life Outcomes (1996)Current challenges in clinimetrics (2003)Sleep disturbance in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: evaluation by medical outcomes study and visual analog sleep scales. (2006)Evaluating the responsiveness of the Warwick Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS): Group and individual level analysis (2012)Interobserver agreement, reliability, and generalizability of data collected in observational studies. (1979)A methodological framework for assessing health indices (1985)Measuring outcomes in primary care: a patient generated measure, MYMOP, compared with the SF-36 health survey (1996)Estimating clinically significant differences in quality of life outcomes (2005)Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. (1991)The minimal detectable change cannot reliably replace the minimal important difference (2009)Minimal important difference to infer changes in health-related quality of life—a systematic review (2017)Understanding the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) of Patient‐Reported Outcome Measures (2019)A review of the use of health status measures in economic evaluation. (1999)Minimally important change determined by a visual method integrating an anchor-based and a distribution-based approach (2006)Protocol of the COSMIN study: COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (2006)Health-Related Quality of Life Measurement in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review of Generic and Disease-Specific Instruments (2008)Parkinson's disease sleep scale—validation of the revised version PDSS‐2 (2011)Reliability and Construct Validity of the Karate-Specific Aerobic Test (2012)Smallest detectable change and test‐retest reliability of a self‐reported outcome measure: Results of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, General Self‐Efficacy Scale, and 12‐item General Health Questionnaire (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2000Methods for assessing responsiveness1,471 cited
  • 2003On assessing responsiveness of health-related quality of life instruments: Guidelines for instrument evaluation664 cited
  • 1992Measuring health status: What are the necessary measurement properties?531 cited
  • 1997Methodological problems in the retrospective computation of responsiveness to change: The lesson of Cronbach524 cited
  • 2002Many faces of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID): a literature review and directions for future research514 cited
  • 2001A taxonomy for responsiveness488 cited
  • 1996Health Status Measures: Strategies and Analytic Methods for Assessing Change Scores433 cited
  • 2001Reproducibility and responsiveness of evaluative outcome measures. Theoretical considerations illustrated by an empirical example.195 cited
  • 2001REPRODUCIBILITY AND RESPONSIVENESS OF EVALUATIVE OUTCOME MEASURES171 cited
  • 2005Assessing sensitivity to change: choosing the appropriate change coefficient157 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work