SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The German Clinical Trials Register: challenges and chances of implementing a bilingual registry
12 references·1 citing·44 second hop
The German Clinical Trials Register: challenges and chances of implementing a bilingual registry (2009)The German Clinical Trials Register: chal…Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)Systematic Review of the Empi…National and multinational prospective trial registers (2008)National and multinational pr…Discrepancies in sample size calculations and data analyses reported in randomised trials: comparison of publications with protocols (2008)Discrepancies in sample size …Clinical research projects at a German medical faculty: follow-up from ethical approval to publication and citation by others (2008)Clinical research projects at…Publication bias against negative results from clinical trials: three of the seven deadly sins (2007)Publication bias against nega…Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts (2007)Full publication of results i…Clinical Trial Registration (2007)Clinical Trial RegistrationEmpirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Empirical Evidence for Select…Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2004)Clinical trial registration: …Registering Clinical Trials (2003)Registering Clinical TrialsHow important is publication bias? A synthesis of available data. (1997)How important is publication …Publication bias: the case for an international registry of clinical trials. (1986)Publication bias: the case fo…Review of the registration of clinical trials in UMIN-CTR from 2 June 2005 to 1 June 2010 - focus on Japan domestic, academic clinical trials (2013)Review of the registration of…Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. A meta-analysis (1994)Positive-Outcome Bias and Other Limitations in the Outcome of Research Abstracts Submitted to a Scientific Meeting (1998)Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases (2010)Chapter 10: Addressing reporting biases (2011)Is working memory training effective? A meta-analytic review. (2012)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Using the Internet for Surveys and Health Research (2002)Comparison of Registered and Published Primary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials (2009)The Short-term Impact of Unconditional Cash Transfers to the Poor: Experimental Evidence from Kenya* (2016)Publication Decisions and their Possible Effects on Inferences Drawn from Tests of Significance—or Vice Versa (1959)Publication bias and clinical trials (1987)Reporting bias in medical research - a narrative review (2010)Pre-registration in social psychology—A discussion and suggested template (2016)Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts (2018)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Evidence for the Selective Reporting of Analyses and Discrepancies in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review of Cohort Studies of Clinical Trials (2014)Reducing bias, increasing transparency and calibrating confidence with preregistration (2023)SPIRIT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials (2025)H.R. Rothstein, A.J. Sutton, & M. Borenstein (Eds.) (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments. NewYork: Wiley, xvii+356 p. US$100.00. ISBN: 0-470-87014-1. (2007)Treatment as usual and routine care in research and clinical practice (2015)Qualitative Research Methods (2021)Research Design in Clinical Psychology (2021)Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2005)Choosing Prediction Over Explanation in Psychology: Lessons From Machine Learning (2017)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis (2020)meta-analysis bias in location and selection of studies (1998)Reporting of eligibility criteria of randomised trials: cohort study comparing trial protocols with subsequent articles (2011)Publication bias in diagnostic imaging: conference abstracts with positive conclusions are more likely to be published (2020)Time to publication for results of clinical trials (2024)Is This Clinical Trial Fully Registered? — A Statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2005)How Trustworthy Is the Scientific Literature in Industrial and Organizational Psychology? (2013)How to make more published research true (2015)Impacts and Determinants of Health Levels in Low-Income Countries (2016)Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis (2007)Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry (2008)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)A Review of Transformational School Leadership Research 1996–2005 (2005)Review: Immigrants and Health Care Access, Quality, and Cost (2009)About and beyond leading uniqueness and belongingness: A systematic review of inclusive leadership research (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2004Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials1,845 cited
  • 2008Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias1,544 cited
  • 2007Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts996 cited
  • 1986Publication bias: the case for an international registry of clinical trials.746 cited
  • 2003Registering Clinical Trials511 cited
  • 1997How important is publication bias? A synthesis of available data.311 cited
  • 2008Discrepancies in sample size calculations and data analyses reported in randomised trials: comparison of publications with protocols201 cited
  • 2007Clinical Trial Registration135 cited
  • 2007Publication bias against negative results from clinical trials: three of the seven deadly sins118 cited
  • 2008Clinical research projects at a German medical faculty: follow-up from ethical approval to publication and citation by others47 cited
  • 2004Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.37 cited
  • 2008National and multinational prospective trial registers30 cited

Cited by

  • 2013Review of the registration of clinical trials in UMIN-CTR from 2 June 2005 to 1 June 2010 - focus on Japan domestic, academic clinical trials14 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work