SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Surgical evaluation and knowledge transfer—methods of clinical research in surgery
14 references·1 citing·49 second hop
Surgical evaluation and knowledge transfer—methods of clinical research in surgery (2011)Surgical evaluation and knowledge transfe…Clinical trials should begin and end with systematic reviews of relevant evidence: 12 years and waiting (2010)Clinical trials should begin …The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Repo…Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation (2009)Challenges in evaluating surg…Extending the CONSORT Statement to Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatment: Explanation and Elaboration (2008)Extending the CONSORT Stateme…Blinding of Outcomes in Trials of Orthopaedic Trauma: An Opportunity to Enhance the Validity of Clinical Trials (2008)Blinding of Outcomes in Trial…Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Empirical Evidence for Select…Doing New Research? Don't Forget the Old (2004)Doing New Research? Don't For…Clinical Trial Registration (2004)Clinical Trial RegistrationRandomised trials in surgery: problems and possible solutions (2002)Randomised trials in surgery:…Randomized, controlled trials in surgery (2001)Randomized, controlled trials…Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Meta-analysis of Observationa…Methodologic standards in surgical trials (1996)Methodologic standards in sur…Large-scale randomized evidence: Large, simple trials and overviews of trials (1995)Large-scale randomized eviden…Evaluating new surgical procedures (1995)Evaluating new surgical proce…Scientific evaluation of modern clinical research: we need a new currency! (2011)Scientific evaluation of mode…The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses (2010)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (2007)A Systematic Examination of the Citation of Prior Research in Reports of Randomized, Controlled Trials (2011)Evidence-Based Research Series-Paper 1: What Evidence-Based Research is and why is it important? (2020)SPIRIT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials (2025)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Why do we need systematic overviews of randomized trials? (Transcript of an oral presentation, modified by the editors) (1987)The Cochrane Collaboration: Preparing, Maintaining, and Disseminating Systematic Reviews of the Effects of Health Care (1993)Cumulative meta-analysis of clinical trials builds evidence for exemplary medical care (1995)A systematic review of comparisons of effect sizes derived from randomised and non-randomised studies. (2000)Good Research Practices for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Alongside Clinical Trials: The ISPOR RCT-CEA Task Force Report (2005)Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement (2008)IDEAL framework for surgical innovation 1: the idea and development stages (2013)No Surgical Innovation Without Evaluation (2018)The IDEAL Reporting Guidelines (2020)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis (2007)Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry (2008)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Behavior Change Technique Taxonomy (v1) of 93 Hierarchically Clustered Techniques: Building an International Consensus for the Reporting of Behavior Change Interventions (2013)CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials (2016)CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials (2016)Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)METHODOLOGICAL INDEX FOR NON-RANDOMIZED STUDIES ( MINORS ): DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF A NEW INSTRUMENT (2003)A checklist to evaluate a report of a nonpharmacological trial (CLEAR NPT) was developed using consensus (2005)Methods and Processes of the CONSORT Group: Example of an Extension for Trials Assessing Nonpharmacologic Treatments (2008)Epidemiology in Medicine. (1988)The Reporting of Randomized Clinical Trials Using a Surgical Intervention Is in Need of Immediate Improvement (2006)Plastic Surgery Classics: Characteristics of 50 Top-Cited Articles in Four Plastic Surgery Journals since 1946 (2008)Evidence-Based Medicine, Systematic Reviews, and Guidelines in Interventional Pain Management: Part 4: Observational Studies (2009)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Patient-Important Outcomes in Registered Diabetes Trials (2008)Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network (2010)Assessing risk of bias due to missing results in a synthesis (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration28,094 cited
  • 2000Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting20,612 cited
  • 2008Extending the CONSORT Statement to Randomized Trials of Nonpharmacologic Treatment: Explanation and Elaboration2,290 cited
  • 2004Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials1,845 cited
  • 2002Randomised trials in surgery: problems and possible solutions762 cited
  • 2009Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation654 cited
  • 2004Clinical Trial Registration579 cited
  • 1995Large-scale randomized evidence: Large, simple trials and overviews of trials365 cited
  • 2001Randomized, controlled trials in surgery201 cited
  • 2010Clinical trials should begin and end with systematic reviews of relevant evidence: 12 years and waiting166 cited
  • 2004Doing New Research? Don't Forget the Old101 cited
  • 1996Methodologic standards in surgical trials84 cited
  • 1995Evaluating new surgical procedures77 cited
  • 2008Blinding of Outcomes in Trials of Orthopaedic Trauma: An Opportunity to Enhance the Validity of Clinical Trials65 cited

Cited by

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2011Scientific evaluation of modern clinical research: we need a new currency!12 cited