Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Improvement in the quality of abstracts in major clinical journals since CONSORT extension for abstracts: A systematic review

16 references·16 citing·41 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

2005Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic.7,009 cited
2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials5,372 cited
1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials3,126 cited
2001The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials2,545 cited
1997Discrepancies between Meta-Analyses and Subsequent Large Randomized, Controlled Trials1,170 cited
2006Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review873 cited
2008CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration670 cited
2008CONSORT for reporting randomised trials in journal and conference abstracts460 cited
2012Effect of editors' implementation of CONSORT guidelines on the reporting of abstracts in high impact medical journals: interrupted time series analysis235 cited
2004An observational study found that authors of randomized controlled trials frequently use concealment of randomization and blinding, despite the failure to report these methods209 cited
2013A systematic scoping review of adherence to reporting guidelines in health care literature193 cited
2001

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials

193 cited

2012Assessment of adherence to the CONSORT statement for quality of reports on randomized controlled trial abstracts from four high-impact general medical journals140 cited

2004Current findings from research on structured abstracts.120 cited

2010Has the quality of abstracts for randomised controlled trials improved since the release of Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trial guideline for abstract reporting? A survey of four high-profile anaesthesia journals89 cited

Cited by

2020Reporting of methodological studies in health research: a protocol for the development of the MethodologIcal STudy reportIng Checklist (MISTIC)72 cited
2020Transparent Reporting of Multivariable Prediction Models in Journal and Conference Abstracts: TRIPOD for Abstracts70 cited
2016Reporting quality of randomised controlled trial abstracts among high-impact general medical journals: a review and analysis65 cited
2019The reporting of progression criteria in protocols of pilot trials designed to assess the feasibility of main trials is insufficient: a meta-epidemiological study57 cited
2018Reporting quality of randomized controlled trial abstracts in the seven highest-ranking anesthesiology journals56 cited
2016A comparison of quality of abstracts of systematic reviews including meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in high-impact general medicine journals before and after the publication of PRISMA extension for abstracts: a systematic review and meta-analysis51 cited
2022Epilepsy‐related stigma and attitudes: Systematic review of screening instruments and interventions ‐ Report by the International League Against Epilepsy Task Force on Stigma in Epilepsy51 cited
2015Reporting quality of randomized controlled trial abstracts47 cited
2018Comparison of conference abstracts and full‐text publications of randomized controlled trials presented at four consecutive World Congresses of Pain: Reporting quality and agreement of results37 cited
2017Assessing reporting quality of randomized controlled trial abstracts in psychiatry: Adherence to CONSORT for abstracts: A systematic review35 cited
2020Abstracts of published randomized controlled trials in Endodontics: reporting quality and spin33 cited
2017Reporting of critical care trial abstracts: a comparison before and after the announcement of CONSORT guideline for abstracts30 cited
2017Reporting Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials of Periodontal Diseases in Journal Abstracts—A Cross-sectional Survey and Bibliometric Analysis30 cited
2019Abstracts of Low Back Pain Trials Are Poorly Reported, Contain Spin of Information, and Are Inconsistent With the Full Text: An Overview Study30 cited
2016Abstracts reporting of HIV/AIDS randomized controlled trials in general medicine and infectious diseases journals: completeness to date and improvement in the quality since CONSORT extension for abstracts29 cited
2018Reporting quality of trial abstracts—improved yet suboptimal: A systematic review and meta‐analysis28 cited