An existential framework of spirituality

Abstract

A holistic approach to spirituality indicates a spiritual development that is relevant for all students and not just for those who have a religious background. However, debates in England surrounding spirituality in education often generally locate it within the religious domain (Blake, 1996 Blake, N. (1996). Against spiritual education. Oxford Review of Education, 22(4): 443–456. [Google Scholar];Carr, 1995 Carr, D. (1995). Towards a distinctive conception of spiritual education. Oxford Review of Education, 21(1): 83–98. [Google Scholar], 1999 Carr, D. (1999). Spiritual language and the ethics of redemption: a reply to Jim Mackenzie. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 33(3): 451–461. [Google Scholar];Isherwood, 1999 Isherwood, L. (1999). Liberating spirituality: empowered people for a world in need of passion. British Journal of Religious Education, 21(2): 80–89. [Google Scholar]). Conceptualizing spirituality in such a way tends to deny access to this development for non‐religious students or students in non‐religious contexts. Alternatively the other approaches to spirituality have adopted non‐religious viewpoints (see Erricker, 2003 Erricker, C. (2003). Against the protection of childhood innocence. International Journal of Children's Spirituality, 8(1): 3–7. [Google Scholar], p. 7). Such either/or approaches work against the notion that spirituality should be conceived as intrinsic to the enterprise of education. This paper offers a brief view of a more elaborate existential framework of spirituality which has been developed in order to transcend the religious/secular divide. A short account of Existentialist philosophy is provided before an outline of the framework is discussed.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 46 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.