SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Research Fundamentals: Choosing an Appropriate Journal, Manuscript Preparation, and Interactions with Editors
5 references·0 citing·23 second hop
Research Fundamentals: Choosing an Appropriate Journal, Manuscript Preparation, and Interactions with Editors (2001)Research Fundamentals: Choosing an Approp…The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)The CONSORT Statement: Revise…Do Readers and Peer Reviewers Agree on Manuscript Quality? (1994)Do Readers and Peer Reviewers…Authors' Criteria for Selecting Journals (1994)Authors' Criteria for Selecti…Reference accuracy in the emergency medicine literature (1993)Reference accuracy in the eme…Guidelines on Authorship of Medical Papers (1986)Guidelines on Authorship of M…How accurate are quotations and references in medical journals? (1985)UNIFORM REQUIREMENTS FOR MANUSCRIPTS SUBMITTED TO BIOMEDICAL JOURNALS (1988)Quotational and reference accuracy in surgical journals. A continuing peer review problem (1990)Citing practices in ecology: can we believe our own words? (2007)One in four citations in marine biology papers is inappropriate (2010)How accurate are citations of frequently cited papers in biomedical literature? (2021)Clinical biostatistics: LIV. The biostatistics of concordance (1981)Manuscript Quality before and after Peer Review and Editing at Annals of Internal Medicine (1994)How reliable is peer review? An examination of operating grant proposals simultaneously submitted to two similar peer review systems (1997)Judging the judges: the role of journal editors (2002)Quality of Intervention Research Reporting in Medical Rehabilitation Journals (2002)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)The fate of manuscripts rejected by a general medical journal (2000)Citation frequency: A biased measure of research impact significantly influenced by the geographical origin of research articles (2007)Publication Bias in the Anesthesiology Literature (2012)Misrepresentation and Responsibility in Medical Research (1987)Authorship! Authorship! Guests, ghosts, grafters, and the two-sided coin (1994)Changes in authorship patterns in prestigious US medical journals (2004)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2001The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials2,545 cited
  • 1986Guidelines on Authorship of Medical Papers118 cited
  • 1994Authors' Criteria for Selecting Journals81 cited
  • 1993Reference accuracy in the emergency medicine literature49 cited
  • 1994Do Readers and Peer Reviewers Agree on Manuscript Quality?46 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work