SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
What Is the Methodologic Quality of Human Therapy Studies in ISI Surgical Publications?
5 references·16 citing·44 second hop
What Is the Methodologic Quality of Human Therapy Studies in ISI Surgical Publications? (2006)What Is the Methodologic Quality of Human…The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration (2003)The STARD statement for repor…Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality? (2003)Impact factor: a valid measur…Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1998)Improving the quality of repo…Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Improving the quality of repo…Little Science, Big Science (1963)Little Science, Big ScienceEstudios bibliométricos. Una opción para desarrollar investigación en cirugía y disciplinas afines (2024)Estudios bibliométricos. Una …Registration and Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews on Surgical Intervention: A Meta-epidemiological Study (2022)Registration and Reporting Qu…A unified framework for bias assessment in clinical research (2019)A unified framework for bias …Checklist for Reporting Results Using Observational Descriptive Studies as Research Designs: The MInCir Initiative (2017)Checklist for Reporting Resul…PAUTAS DE CHEQUEO, PARTE II: QUOROM Y PRISMA (2015)PAUTAS DE CHEQUEO, PARTE II: …Instructions for the Use of MInCir Scale to Assess Methodological Quality in Therapy Studies (2015)Instructions for the Use of M…Reliability and validity of MINCIR scale for methodological quality in dental therapy research (2014)Reliability and validity of M…Productividad y calidad metodológica de artículos clínicos en cirugía oral y maxilofacial en Chile: Período 2001-2012 (2013)Productividad y calidad metod…Confiabilidad de la escala MINCIR para valorar calidad metodológica de estudios de terapia (2013)Confiabilidad de la escala MI…Bibliometric analysis of articles published in ISI dental journals, 2007–2011 (2013)Bibliometric analysis of arti…Impacto y visibilidad de la Revista Chilena de Cirugía tras su indización en las bases de datos SciELO e ISI: Análisis bibliométrico (2012)Impacto y visibilidad de la R…Methodological quality of articles on therapeutic procedures published in Cirugía Española. Evaluation of the period 2005–2008 (2010)Methodological quality of art…Systematic Review of Literature with Different Types of Designs (2009)Systematic Review of Literatu…Fecal Incontinence: The Quality of Reported Randomized, Controlled Trials in the Last Ten Years (2007)Fecal Incontinence: The Quali…¿Cómo presentar los resultados de una investigación científica? II. El manuscrito y el proceso de publicación (2007)¿Cómo presentar los resultado…¿Cuál es la calidad metodológica de los artículos sobre procedimientos terapéuticos publicados en Cirugía Española? (2006)¿Cuál es la calidad metodológ…Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Journal impact factor: a brief review. (1999)Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor (2008)Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review (2008)Current concepts on bibliometrics: a brief review about impact factor, Eigenfactor score, CiteScore, SCImago Journal Rank, Source-Normalised Impact per Paper, H-index, and alternative metrics (2018)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Pautas de chequeo, parte III: STROBE y ARRIVE (2016)Bibliometric Mapping of Scientific Literature Located in Scopus on Teaching Digital Competence in Higher Education (2023)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)A Systematic Evaluation of the Impact of STRICTA and CONSORT Recommendations on Quality of Reporting for Acupuncture Trials (2008)Research Review: Recommendations for reporting on treatment trials for child and adolescent anxiety disorders – an international consensus statement (2020)CONSORT 2025 statement: Updated guideline for reporting randomised trials (2025)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Health Measurement Scales (2008)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (2015)¿Cuántos Tipos de Revisiones de la Literatura Existen? Enumeración, Descripción y Clasificación. Revisión Cualitativa (2023)Coverage analysis of Scopus: A journal metric approach (2007)Inter-country R&D efficiency analysis: An application of data envelopment analysis (2008)Citation time window choice for research impact evaluation (2012)Evolution of connected health: a network perspective (2017)Análisis bibliométrico de la Revista Española de Documentación Científica desde su inclusión en la Web of Science (2008-2018) (2020)Artificial intelligence ethics in services: are we paying attention to that?! (2024)Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests (1999)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (Chinese edition) (2009)Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines (2010)Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed (2011)The Delphi technique: myths and realities (2003)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)Connectedness, Self-Esteem, and Prosocial Behaviors Protect Adolescent Mental Health Following Social Isolation: A Systematic Review (2021)Methodological quality assessment should move beyond design specificity (2023)A scoping review shows that no single existing risk of bias assessment tool considers all sources of bias for cross-sectional studies (2024)Networks of Scientific Papers (1965)The Matthew Effect in Science (1968)Learning by Expanding (2014)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1963Little Science, Big Science4,272 cited
  • 1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
  • 2003The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration1,214 cited
  • 2003Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality?584 cited
  • 1998Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement177 cited

Cited by

  • 2017Checklist for Reporting Results Using Observational Descriptive Studies as Research Designs: The MInCir Initiative41 cited
  • 2019A unified framework for bias assessment in clinical research41 cited
  • 2009Systematic Review of Literature with Different Types of Designs41 cited
  • 2015PAUTAS DE CHEQUEO, PARTE II: QUOROM Y PRISMA30 cited
  • 2013Bibliometric analysis of articles published in ISI dental journals, 2007–201128 cited
  • 2006¿Cuál es la calidad metodológica de los artículos sobre procedimientos terapéuticos publicados en Cirugía Española?26 cited
  • 2007¿Cómo presentar los resultados de una investigación científica? II. El manuscrito y el proceso de publicación18 cited
  • 2013Productividad y calidad metodológica de artículos clínicos en cirugía oral y maxilofacial en Chile: Período 2001-201214 cited
  • 2013Confiabilidad de la escala MINCIR para valorar calidad metodológica de estudios de terapia

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

12 cited
  • 2022Registration and Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews on Surgical Intervention: A Meta-epidemiological Study12 cited
  • 2015Instructions for the Use of MInCir Scale to Assess Methodological Quality in Therapy Studies12 cited
  • 2024Estudios bibliométricos. Una opción para desarrollar investigación en cirugía y disciplinas afines11 cited
  • 2014Reliability and validity of MINCIR scale for methodological quality in dental therapy research11 cited
  • 2007Fecal Incontinence: The Quality of Reported Randomized, Controlled Trials in the Last Ten Years11 cited
  • 2010Methodological quality of articles on therapeutic procedures published in Cirugía Española. Evaluation of the period 2005–200810 cited
  • 2012Impacto y visibilidad de la Revista Chilena de Cirugía tras su indización en las bases de datos SciELO e ISI: Análisis bibliométrico10 cited