Summing up evidence: one answer is not always enoughJoseph Lau, John P. A. Ioannidis, Christopher H. Schmid1998-01-01articleThe Lancet655 citationsclosedNo readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsStatistical Methods in Clinical TrialsDelphi Technique in ResearchAbstractNo abstract was published for this record.Citations in this libraryStored only when both papers are in the corpus — 655 citations exist upstream.References1986Meta-analysis in clinical trials1995Empirical Evidence of Bias1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials1995The Handbook of Research Synthesis.1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement1996Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials1997Quantitative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews1994The Handbook of Research Synthesis.Cited by2009Men and things, women and people: A meta-analysis of sex differences in interests.2009Meta-Analyst: software for meta-analysis of binary, continuous and diagnostic data2002To IPD or not to IPD?2005In an empirical evaluation of the funnel plot, researchers could not visually identify publication bias2002Correlation of Quality Measures With Estimates of Treatment Effect in Meta-analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials2002Individual patient‐ versus group‐level data meta‐regressions for the investigation of treatment effect modifiers: ecological bias rears its ugly head2001Approaches to heterogeneity in meta‐analysis2000Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology