SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Research culture and New Zealand’s performance-based research fund: some insights from bibliographic compilations of research outputs
5 references·9 citing·46 second hop
Research culture and New Zealand’s performance-based research fund: some insights from bibliographic compilations of research outputs (2010)Research culture and New Zealand’s perfor…UK Research Assessment Exercises: Informed judgments on research quality or quantity? (2007)UK Research Assessment Exerci…The UK Research Assessment Exercise: the evolution of a national research evaluation system (2007)The UK Research Assessment Ex…Benchmarking Google Scholar with the New Zealand PBRF research assessment exercise (2007)Benchmarking Google Scholar w…Judging the quality of research in business schools: The UK as a case study (1995)Judging the quality of resear…Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Citation Analysis as a Tool i…Methods to evaluate institutional responses to performance‐based research funding systems (2022)Methods to evaluate instituti…How a Networked Approach to Building Capacity in Knowledge Mobilization Supports Research Impact (2020)How a Networked Approach to B…An evaluation of metrics used by the Performance-based Research Fund process in New Zealand (2018)An evaluation of metrics used…The New Zealand performance-based research fund and its impact on publication activity in economics (2013)The New Zealand performance-b…The ‘new majority’ and the academization of journalism (2012)The ‘new majority’ and the ac…Citations as a Measure of the Research Outputs of New Zealand’s Economics Departments: The Problem of ‘Long and Variable Lags’ (2012)Citations as a Measure of the…Benchmarking citation measures among the Australian education professoriate (2012)Benchmarking citation measure…A ‘perverse incentive’ from bibliometrics: could National Research Assessment Exercises (NRAEs) restrict literature availability for nature conservation? (2012)A ‘perverse incentive’ from b…Shapley values for assessing research production and impact of schools and scholars (2011)Shapley values for assessing …An Examination of Citation Counts in a New Scholarly Communication Environment (2005)Google Scholar: The New Generation of Citation Indexes (2005)Which h-index? — A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar (2007)What makes a journal international? A case study using conservation biology journals (2010)An analysis of a decade of research in 10 instructional design and technology journals (2013)The impact of Cochrane Reviews: a mixed-methods evaluation of outputs from Cochrane Review Groups supported by the National Institute for Health Research (2015)Assessing the Relative Impacts of Economics Journals (1983)DETERMINANTS OF FACULTY PAY: AN AGENCY THEORY PERSPECTIVE. (1992)Measuring Canadian Business School Research Output and Impact (2002)Changes in Academic Work and the Chair Regime: The Case of German Business Administration Academics (2005)More than a numbers game: qualitative research in accounting (2006)17. A Value for n-Person Games (1953)A value for n -person games (1988)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Equal weights coauthorship sharing and the Shapley value are equivalent (2013)Synergy within the West African Triple Helix innovation systems as measured with game theory (2019)Academic co-authorship is a risky game (2023)A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures (2009)When Knowledge Wins: Transcending the Sense and Nonsense of Academic Rankings (2009)How journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between Innovation Studies and Business & Management (2012)Users beware: implications of database errors when assessing the individual research records of ecologists and conservation biologists (2013)The changing research landscape and reflections on national research assessment in the future (2019)Networks of Scientific Papers (1965)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior (2008)The scientific impact of nations (2004)Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation (2005)Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research (2005)Do rankings reflect research quality? (2010)Accountability in context: effects of research evaluation systems on publication practices, disciplinary norms, and individual working routines in the faculty of Arts at Uppsala University (2014)Research, teaching and performance evaluation in academia: the salience of quality (2015)Revealed Performances: Worldwide Rankings of Economists and Economics Departments, 1990–2000 (2003)Nine Facts about Top Journals in Economics (2013)A Critique of the Bucket Classification of Journals: The ABDC List as an Example (2016)Perceptions of Scholars in the Field of Economics on Co-Authorship Associations: Evidence from an International Survey (2016)Research assessment using early citation information (2016)On the Statistics of Individual Variations of Productivity in Research Laboratories (1957)Productivity Differences Among Scientists: Evidence for Accumulative Advantage (1974)The Metric Tide: Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management (2015)Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come (2004)A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data (2006)Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (2007)Past performance, peer review and project selection: a case study in the social and behavioral sciences (2009)The Assessment of Research Quality in UK Universities: Peer Review or Metrics? (2010)The UK and Italian research assessment exercises face to face (2013)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1972Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation2,781 cited
  • 2007UK Research Assessment Exercises: Informed judgments on research quality or quantity?183 cited
  • 2007The UK Research Assessment Exercise: the evolution of a national research evaluation system144 cited
  • 1995Judging the quality of research in business schools: The UK as a case study56 cited
  • 2007Benchmarking Google Scholar with the New Zealand PBRF research assessment exercise42 cited

Cited by

  • 2013The New Zealand performance-based research fund and its impact on publication activity in economics31 cited
  • 2012A ‘perverse incentive’ from bibliometrics: could National Research Assessment Exercises (NRAEs) restrict literature availability for nature conservation?21 cited
  • 2020How a Networked Approach to Building Capacity in Knowledge Mobilization Supports Research Impact17 cited
  • 2011Shapley values for assessing research production and impact of schools and scholars14 cited
  • 2018An evaluation of metrics used by the Performance-based Research Fund process in New Zealand13 cited
  • 2012The ‘new majority’ and the academization of journalism12 cited
  • 2012Citations as a Measure of the Research Outputs of New Zealand’s Economics Departments: The Problem of ‘Long and Variable Lags’11 cited
  • 2012Benchmarking citation measures among the Australian education professoriate11 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2022Methods to evaluate institutional responses to performance‐based research funding systems7 cited