SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The impact factor: a useful indicator of journal quality or fatally flawed?
4 references·10 citing·47 second hop
The impact factor: a useful indicator of journal quality or fatally flawed? (2013)The impact factor: a useful indicator of …Publication Times, Impact Factors, and Advance Online Publication in Ophthalmology Journals (2013)Publication Times, Impact Fac…Manuscript rejection in ophthalmology and visual science journals: identifying and avoiding the common pitfalls (2009)Manuscript rejection in ophth…How impact factors changed medical publishing—and science (2007)How impact factors changed me…Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)Why the impact factor of jour…Rethinking the Journal Impact Factor and Publishing in the Digital Age. (2020)Rethinking the Journal Impact…Journal impact factor: A valid symbol of journal quality? (2019)Journal impact factor: A vali…Publication outcome of abstracts submitted to the American Academy of Ophthalmology meeting (2018)Publication outcome of abstra…Eigenfactor score and alternative bibliometrics surpass the impact factor in a 2-years ahead annual-citation calculation: a linear mixed design model analysis of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Medical Imaging journals (2018)Eigenfactor score and alterna…Correlation Between Perception-Based Journal Rankings and the Journal Impact Factor (JIF): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2017)Correlation Between Perceptio…Open access journals in educational technology: Results of a survey of experienced users (2016)Open access journals in educa…Comparison of indexing times among articles from medical, nursing, and pharmacy journals (2016)Comparison of indexing times …The quandary between communication and certification (2015)The quandary between communic…A method for measuring individual research productivity in hospitals: development and feasibility (2015)A method for measuring indivi…Self-Citation Rate and Impact Factor in Ophthalmology (2014)Self-Citation Rate and Impact…Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects (1997)Effect of the Statistical Significance of Results on the Time to Completion and Publication of Randomized Efficacy Trials (1998)Journal peer review: a bar or bridge? An analysis of a paper’s revision history and turnaround time, and the effect on citation (2018)Time from submission to publication in plastic surgery journals: The story of accepted manuscripts (2019)Time from submission to publication varied widely for biomedical journals: a systematic review (2021)The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence (1990)Reasons Reviewers Reject and Accept Manuscripts (2001)The Top 10 Reasons Why Manuscripts Are Not Accepted for Publication (2004)Hiring a professional medical writer: is it equivalent to ghostwriting? (2014)Research on the Submission, Acceptance and Publication Times of Articles Submitted to International Otorhinolaryngology Journals (2015)Reasons for Manuscript Rejection After Peer Review From the Journal Headache (2018)Author Sequence and Credit for Contributions in Multiauthored Publications (2007)The use and misuse of journal metrics and other citation indicators (2009)Bibliometric Indicators: Quality Measurements of Scientific Publication (2010)Research Productivity Index (RPI): a new metric for measuring universities’ research productivity (2020)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Chance and Consensus in Peer Review (1981)Publishing by—and for?—the Numbers (1990)A review of theory and practice in scientometrics (2015)A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (2016)Impact factor of a scientific journal: Is it a measure of quality of research? (2013)Delay in indexing articles published in major pharmacy practice journals (2014)Needs of people with dementia and their informal caregivers concerning assistive technologies (2019)Publication speed in pharmacy practice journals: A comparative analysis (2021)Improving the quality of publications in and advancing the paradigms of clinical and social pharmacy practice research: The Granada statements (2023)Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)The use of departmental journal lists in promotion and tenure decisions at American research universities (2019)Expert judgments versus publication-based metrics: Do the two methods produce identical results in measuring academic reputation? (2021)Impact and visibility of Norwegian, Finnish and Spanish journals in the fields of humanities (2021)Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts (2007)Publication Rates of Presentations at an Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (2009)Views on the peer review system of biomedical journals: an online survey of academics from high-ranking universities (2013)The fate of abstracts presented at international ophthalmology meetings: 2- and 5-year publication rates (2018)Frequency of Abstracts Presented at Eye and Vision Conferences Being Developed Into Full-Length Publications (2020)Fortnightly Review: How can impact factors be improved? (1996)The Eigenfactor™ Metrics: Figure 1. (2008)Understanding Bibliometric Parameters and Analysis (2015)The impact of the open-access status on journal indices: a review of medical journals (2019)The most influential articles in Helicobacter pylori research: A bibliometric analysis (2019)Robust h-index (2021)Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics (2015)Submitting a Manuscript to a Scientific Journal (2023)A combined bibliometric indicator to predict article impact (2010)Impact factors, scientometrics and the history of citation-based research (2012)Accounting for Impact? The Journal Impact Factor and the Making of Biomedical Research in the Netherlands (2015)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1997Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research2,444 cited
  • 2007How impact factors changed medical publishing—and science129 cited
  • 2013Publication Times, Impact Factors, and Advance Online Publication in Ophthalmology Journals83 cited
  • 2009Manuscript rejection in ophthalmology and visual science journals: identifying and avoiding the common pitfalls43 cited

Cited by

  • 2018Eigenfactor score and alternative bibliometrics surpass the impact factor in a 2-years ahead annual-citation calculation: a linear mixed design model analysis of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Medical Imaging journals40 cited
  • 2016Comparison of indexing times among articles from medical, nursing, and pharmacy journals30 cited
  • 2015A method for measuring individual research productivity in hospitals: development and feasibility28 cited
  • 2018Publication outcome of abstracts submitted to the American Academy of Ophthalmology meeting27 cited
  • 2017Correlation Between Perception-Based Journal Rankings and the Journal Impact Factor (JIF): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis23 cited
  • 2020Rethinking the Journal Impact Factor and Publishing in the Digital Age.19 cited
  • 2014Self-Citation Rate and Impact Factor in Ophthalmology15 cited
  • 2015The quandary between communication and certification13 cited
  • 2016Open access journals in educational technology: Results of a survey of experienced users

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

11 cited
  • 2019Journal impact factor: A valid symbol of journal quality?11 cited