SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
What do university rankings by fields rank? Exploring discrepancies between the organizational structure of universities and bibliometric classifications
16 references·4 citing·42 second hop
What do university rankings by fields rank? Exploring discrepancies between the organizational structure of universities and bibliometric classifications (2013)What do university rankings by fields ran…Ranking and mapping of universities and research-focused institutions worldwide based on highly-cited papers (2013)Ranking and mapping of univer…Multilevel‐statistical reformulation of citation‐based university rankings: The Leiden ranking 2011/2012 (2013)Multilevel‐statistical reform…Do universities or research institutions with a specific subject profile have an advantage or a disadvantage in institutional rankings? (2013)Do universities or research i…The Leiden ranking 2011/2012: Data collection, indicators, and interpretation (2012)The Leiden ranking 2011/2012:…Source normalized indicators of citation impact: an overview of different approaches and an empirical comparison (2012)Source normalized indicators …A ranking of universities should account for differences in their disciplinary specialization (2011)A ranking of universities sho…A methodology for Institution-Field ranking based on a bidimensional analysis: the IFQ 2 A index (2011)A methodology for Institution…Scopus's source normalized impact per paper (SNIP) versus a journal impact factor based on fractional counting of citations (2010)Scopus's source normalized im…Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals (2010)Measuring contextual citation…Modelling of bibliometric approaches and importance of output verification in research performance assessment (2007)Modelling of bibliometric app…A first approach to the classification of the top 500 world universities by their disciplinary characteristics using scientometrics (2006)A first approach to the class…Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods (2005)Fatal attraction: Conceptual …A new classification scheme of science fields and subfields designed for scientometric evaluation purposes (2003)A new classification scheme o…Algorithmic procedure for finding semantically related journals (2002)Algorithmic procedure for fin…The analysis of household surveys (1997)The analysis of household sur…The New production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies (1995)The New production of knowled…An Observation of Research Complexity in Top Universities Based on Research Publications (2017)An Observation of Research Co…Towards a global scientific brain: Indicators of researcher mobility using co-affiliation data (2016)Towards a global scientific b…What is behind the curtain of the L eiden R anking? (2015)What is behind the curtain of…Research classification and the social sciences and humanities in Australia: (Mis)Matching organizational unit contribution and the impact of collaboration (2015)Research classification and t…A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth (1956)Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations (1991)Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models (1995)Monitoring Corruption: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Indonesia (2007)The Economic Lives of the Poor (2007)Women Empowerment and Economic Development (2012)Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation (1972)Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research (1997)An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output (2005)Bibliometrics: tracking research impact by selecting the appropriate metrics (2015)Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): A New Metric That Uses Citation Rates to Measure Influence at the Article Level (2016)Current concepts on bibliometrics: a brief review about impact factor, Eigenfactor score, CiteScore, SCImago Journal Rank, Source-Normalised Impact per Paper, H-index, and alternative metrics (2018)League Tables and Their Limitations: Statistical Issues in Comparisons of Institutional Performance (1996)Rankings and the Reshaping of Higher Education: The Battle for World-Class Excellence (2011)A new approach to the QS university ranking using the composite I ‐distance indicator: Uncertainty and sensitivity analyses (2015)Rankings and university performance: A conditional multidimensional approach (2015)The Philosophical Basis of Peer Review and the Suppression of Innovation (1990)Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups (2006)Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review (2008)University research funding and publication performance—An international comparison (2010)Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequencesfor international comparisons of national research performance (2001)The Academic Ranking of World Universities (2005)How do you define and measure research productivity? (2014)Field-normalized citation impact indicators and the choice of an appropriate counting method (2015)Emerging trends and new developments in information science: a document co-citation analysis (2009–2016) (2018)Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact (2008)A new methodology for constructing a publication‐level classification system of science (2012)A systematic empirical comparison of different approaches for normalizing citation impact indicators (2013)The impact of African science: a bibliometric analysis (2014)Determinants of citation impact: A comparative analysis of the Global South versus the Global North (2016)Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool? (1979)Mapping the backbone of science (2005)The impact of collaboration and knowledge networks on citations (2017)Caveats for the use of citation indicators in research and journal evaluations (2007)Lifting the crown—citation z-score (2007)Interdisciplinarity and Impact: Distinct Effects of Variety, Balance, and Disparity (2015)Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems (2000)Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence‐Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review (2003)Sampling Knowledge: The Hermeneutics of Snowball Sampling in Qualitative Research (2008)How are new citation‐based journal indicators adding to the bibliometric toolbox? (2009)Caveats for the journal and field normalizations in the CWTS (“Leiden”) evaluations of research performance (2010)Turning the tables on citation analysis one more time: Principles for comparing sets of documents (2011)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1995The New production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies7,046 cited
  • 1997The analysis of household surveys4,871 cited
  • 2005Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods764 cited
  • 2010Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals624 cited
  • 2012The Leiden ranking 2011/2012: Data collection, indicators, and interpretation444 cited
  • 2003A new classification scheme of science fields and subfields designed for scientometric evaluation purposes329 cited
  • 2002Algorithmic procedure for finding semantically related journals209 cited
  • 2010Scopus's source normalized impact per paper (SNIP) versus a journal impact factor based on fractional counting of citations159 cited
  • 2012Source normalized indicators of citation impact: an overview of different approaches and an empirical comparison149 cited
  • 2013Multilevel‐statistical reformulation of citation‐based university rankings: The Leiden ranking 2011/201263 cited
  • 2013Ranking and mapping of universities and research-focused institutions worldwide based on highly-cited papers60 cited
  • 2011A ranking of universities should account for differences in their disciplinary specialization55 cited
  • 2013Do universities or research institutions with a specific subject profile have an advantage or a disadvantage in institutional rankings?47 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2011A methodology for Institution-Field ranking based on a bidimensional analysis: the IFQ 2 A index39 cited
  • 2007Modelling of bibliometric approaches and importance of output verification in research performance assessment38 cited
  • 2006A first approach to the classification of the top 500 world universities by their disciplinary characteristics using scientometrics37 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2017An Observation of Research Complexity in Top Universities Based on Research Publications19 cited
    • 2016Towards a global scientific brain: Indicators of researcher mobility using co-affiliation data17 cited
    • 2015What is behind the curtain of the L eiden R anking?13 cited
    • 2015Research classification and the social sciences and humanities in Australia: (Mis)Matching organizational unit contribution and the impact of collaboration10 cited