SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The binomial distribution of meta-analysis was preferred to model within-study variability · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleThe binomial distribution of meta-analysis was preferred to model within-study variability

Taye H. Hamza2007

Article2007

The binomial distribution of meta-analysis was preferred to model within-study variability

Taye H. Hamza · Hans C. van Houwelingen · Theo Stijnen

387 citations·0/0 files stored·Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference Statistical Methods in Epidemiology

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 387 citations exist upstream.

References

1986Meta-analysis in clinical trials 2005Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews 2002How should meta‐regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted?1999Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a comparison of methods 2004What to add to nothing? Use and avoidance of continuity corrections in meta‐analysis of sparse data 2002Advanced methods in meta‐analysis: multivariate approach and meta‐regression 2001A hierarchical regression approach to meta‐analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations 1993Combining independent studies of a diagnostic test into a summary roc curve: Data‐analytic approaches and some additional considerations

Cited by

2016Body dysmorphic disorder in different settings: A systematic review and estimated weighted prevalence 2014Predictive distributions for between‐study heterogeneity and simple methods for their application in Bayesian meta‐analysis 2018How well do discrete choice experiments predict health choices? A systematic review and meta-analysis of external validity 2020Arcsine‐based transformations for meta‐analysis of proportions: Pros, cons, and alternatives

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2007Recent developments in meta‐analysisreview · 12 shared references 2011Likelihood-Based Clustering of Meta-Analytic SROC Curvesarticle · 10 shared references 2005Synthesizing medical evidence: systematic reviews and metaanalysesreview · 9 shared references 2014Mixture models in diagnostic meta-analyses—Clustering summary receiver operating characteristic curves accounted for heterogeneity and correlationarticle · 9 shared references 2008Exploring heterogeneity in meta‐analyses: needs, resources and challengesreview · 8 shared references 2016A multivariate method for meta-analysis and comparison of diagnostic testsarticle · 8 shared references

Details

Year2007

Typearticle

Published2007-08-24

VenueJournal of Clinical Epidemiology

ISSN-L0895-4356

Languageen

Citations387

Files0 public / 0

ShelfMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Identifiers

doi10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.03.016

openalex_workW2018696687

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.

2020Meta-analysis of Proportions Using Generalized Linear Mixed Models

2015Misunderstandings about Q and ‘Cochran's Q test' in meta‐analysis

2015Performance of methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy with few studies or sparse data

2008Why add anything to nothing? The arcsine difference as a measure of treatment effect in meta‐analysis with zero cells