SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
THE CONTRIBUTION OF DIFFERENT INFORMATION SOURCES TO IDENTIFY ADVERSE EFFECTS OF A MEDICAL DEVICE: A CASE STUDY USING A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF SPINAL FUSION
8 references·0 citing·34 second hop
THE CONTRIBUTION OF DIFFERENT INFORMATION SOURCES TO IDENTIFY ADVERSE EFFECTS OF A MEDICAL DEVICE: A CASE STUDY USING A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF SPINAL FUSION (2014)THE CONTRIBUTION OF DIFFERENT INFORMATION…Some improvements are apparent in identifying adverse effects in systematic reviews from 1994 to 2011 (2013)Some improvements are apparen…THE CONTRIBUTION OF DIFFERENT INFORMATION SOURCES FOR ADVERSE EFFECTS DATA (2012)THE CONTRIBUTION OF DIFFERENT…Can we prioritise which databases to search? A case study using a systematic review of frozen shoulder management (2012)Can we prioritise which datab…Precision of healthcare systematic review searches in a cross‐sectional sample (2011)Precision of healthcare syste…Sources of information on adverse effects: a systematic review (2010)Sources of information on adv…Patient safety and systematic reviews: finding papers indexed in MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL (2010)Patient safety and systematic…Developing efficient search strategies to identify reports of adverse effects in medline and embase (2006)Developing efficient search s…Multi-database searches in biomedicine: citation duplication and novelty assessment using carbamazepine as an example (1994)Multi-database searches in bi…Room for improvement? A survey of the methods used in systematic reviews of adverse effects (2006)Poor reporting and inadequate searches were apparent in systematic reviews of adverse effects (2008)Evaluating Approaches to Quality Assessment in Library and Information Science LIS Systematic Reviews: A Methodology Review (2016)Overview: comprehensive and carefully constructed strategies are required when conducting searches for adverse effects data (2019)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Better Reporting of Harms in Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT Statement (2004)Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2011)The assessment of the quality of reporting of meta-analyses in diagnostic research: a systematic review (2011)CONSORT Harms 2022 statement, explanation, and elaboration: updated guideline for the reporting of harms in randomized trials (2023)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)A Dictionary of Epidemiology (2008)Retrieval of overviews of systematic reviews in MEDLINE was improved by the development of an objectively derived and validated search strategy (2015)Development and use of a content search strategy for retrieving studies on patients' views and preferences (2017)Evaluation of a new method for librarian‐mediated literature searches for systematic reviews (2017)How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study (2003)Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases (2010)Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care (2010)PubMed coverage varied across specialties and over time: a large-scale study of included studies in Cochrane reviews (2019)Development of an efficient search filter to retrieve systematic reviews from PubMed (2021)Use of a search summary table to improve systematic review search methods, results, and efficiency (2021)Developing Optimal Search Strategies for Detecting Clinically Sound Studies in MEDLINE (1994)How to Read a Paper (1999)Evaluation of methodological search filters—a review (2004)Sensitivity and precision of adverse effects search filters in MEDLINE and EMBASE: a case study of fractures with thiazolidinediones (2011)Integrated Care Search: development and validation of a PubMed search filter for retrieving the integrated care research evidence (2020)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Comparison of Pooled Risk Estimates for Adverse Effects from Different Observational Study Designs: Methodological Overview (2013)Most systematic reviews of adverse effects did not include unpublished data (2016)The reporting of safety among drug systematic reviews was poor before the implementation of the PRISMA harms checklist (2018)Identifying core documents with a multiple evidence relevance filter (2004)Is there an optimum number needed to retrieve to justify inclusion of a database in a systematic review search? (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2006Developing efficient search strategies to identify reports of adverse effects in medline and embase117 cited
  • 2011Precision of healthcare systematic review searches in a cross‐sectional sample80 cited
  • 2012Can we prioritise which databases to search? A case study using a systematic review of frozen shoulder management47 cited
  • 2013Some improvements are apparent in identifying adverse effects in systematic reviews from 1994 to 201134 cited
  • 2010Patient safety and systematic reviews: finding papers indexed in MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL29 cited
  • 2012THE CONTRIBUTION OF DIFFERENT INFORMATION SOURCES FOR ADVERSE EFFECTS DATA22 cited
  • 2010Sources of information on adverse effects: a systematic review17 cited
  • 1994Multi-database searches in biomedicine: citation duplication and novelty assessment using carbamazepine as an example12 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work