The Problems of R in Clinical Settings and in Research: Suggestions for the Future

Abstract

It has been suggested that we control for R in the interpretation of individual Rorschach records. A related, but distinctly different issue concerns controlling for or equating R in research. I suggest we should not control for R in interpreting individual records. There are also some research paradigms in which controlling for R does not seem advisable. In other types of research, I argued that some method of controlling for or equating R appears appropriate. The distributions of many Rorschach factors are markedly non-normal, and in some cases the shapes of the distribution for a particular factor may be different among different populations. In these instances, when attempting to control statistically for R, improper model specification may lead to erroneous findings. Finally, I argue for a theory-based, empirical approach to all future Rorschach research.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 16 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.