SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Systematic reviews on tobacco control from Cochrane and the Community Guide: different methods, similar findings
16 references·1 citing·41 second hop
Systematic reviews on tobacco control from Cochrane and the Community Guide: different methods, similar findings (2010)Systematic reviews on tobacco control fro…The reporting quality of meta-analyses improves: a random sampling study (2008)The reporting quality of meta…No consensus exists on search reporting methods for systematic reviews (2008)No consensus exists on search…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: An independent appraisal* (2007)The quality of reports of cri…Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (2007)Epidemiology and Reporting Ch…THE PROMISE AND PITFALLS OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (2006)THE PROMISE AND PITFALLS OF S…Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews? (2006)Does updating improve the met…Free-Marginal Multirater Kappa (multirater K[free]): An Alternative to Fleiss' Fixed-Marginal Multirater Kappa. (2005)Free-Marginal Multirater Kapp…Research synthesis and dissemination as a bridge to knowledge management: the Cochrane Collaboration. (2004)Research synthesis and dissem…Data collection instrument and procedure for systematic reviews in the guide to community preventive services11The names and affiliations of the Task Force members are listed on page v of this supplement and at http://www.thecommunityguide.org (2000)Data collection instrument an…Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Improving the quality of repo…Methodology and Reports of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (1998)Methodology and Reports of Sy…A guide to interpreting discordant systematic reviews. (1997)A guide to interpreting disco…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. D…Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews (1994)Systematic Reviews: Rationale…Searching the literature. Be systematic in your searching. (1993)Searching the literature. Be …Cochrane Systematic Reviews for the Mental Health Field: Is the Gold Standard Tarnished? (2013)Cochrane Systematic Reviews f…Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)Summing up: The Science of Reviewing Research (1987)A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction (1992)Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews (2014)Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses (2019)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)What contributions do languages other than English make on the results of meta-analyses? (2000)The inclusion of reports of randomised trials published in languages other than English in systematic reviews (2003)Religion/spirituality and adolescent health outcomes: a review (2006)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Quality of systematic reviews in pediatric oncology – A systematic review (2009)The Value of “Traditional” Reviews in the Era of Systematic Reviewing (2009)Twenty Years of Meta-Analyses in Orthopaedic Surgery: Has Quality Kept Up with Quantity? (2010)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis (2007)Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (2013)Systematic literature review of built environment effects on physical activity and active transport – an update and new findings on health equity (2017)The Existence of Publication Bias and Risk Factors for Its Occurrence (1990)Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists (1995)Improving the Quality of Reports of Meta-Analyses of Randomised Controlled Trials: The QUOROM Statement (2000)Overlapping meta-analyses on the same topic: survey of published studies (2013)Managing overlap of primary study results across systematic reviews: practical considerations for authors of overviews of reviews (2021)Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (1994)The Handbook of Research Synthesis. (1995)A systematic review of the content of critical appraisal tools (2004)Qualitative Data Analysis (2008)Collaborative Care to Improve the Management of Depressive Disorders (2012)HIV risk and preventive interventions in transgender women sex workers (2014)Inequalities between multi-rater kappas (2010)The dialectical behavior therapy ways of coping checklist: development and psychometric properties (2010)LIRIS-ACCEDE: A Video Database for Affective Content Analysis (2015)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
  • 1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
  • 1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement4,828 cited
  • 1994Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews1,677 cited
  • 2007Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews891 cited
  • 1998Methodology and Reports of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses534 cited
  • 2000Data collection instrument and procedure for systematic reviews in the guide to community preventive services11The names and affiliations of the Task Force members are listed on page v of this supplement and at http://www.thecommunityguide.org464 cited
  • 1997A guide to interpreting discordant systematic reviews.394 cited
  • 2005Free-Marginal Multirater Kappa (multirater K[free]): An Alternative to Fleiss' Fixed-Marginal Multirater Kappa.392 cited
  • 2007The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: An independent appraisal*112 cited
  • 2008The reporting quality of meta-analyses improves: a random sampling study84 cited
  • 2006THE PROMISE AND PITFALLS OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS82 cited
  • 2008No consensus exists on search reporting methods for systematic reviews63 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

  • 2004Research synthesis and dissemination as a bridge to knowledge management: the Cochrane Collaboration.52 cited
  • 2006Does updating improve the methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews?49 cited
  • 1993Searching the literature. Be systematic in your searching.49 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2013Cochrane Systematic Reviews for the Mental Health Field: Is the Gold Standard Tarnished?9 cited