SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Characteristics and Quality of Systematic Reviews of Acupuncture, Herbal Medicines, and Homeopathy
6 references·0 citing·31 second hop
Characteristics and Quality of Systematic Reviews of Acupuncture, Herbal Medicines, and Homeopathy (2003)Characteristics and Quality of Systematic…How objective are systematic reviews? Differences between reviews on complementary medicine (2003)How objective are systematic …The methodological quality of randomized controlled trials of homeopathy, herbal medicines and acupuncture (2001)The methodological quality of…Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Improving the quality of repo…Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews (1994)Systematic Reviews: Rationale…The comprehensiveness of Medline and Embase computer searches (1992)The comprehensiveness of Medl…Agreement among reviewers of review articles (1991)Agreement among reviewers of …Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research (1976)Summing up: The Science of Reviewing Research (1987)A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction (1992)Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews (2014)Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses (2019)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. (1986)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation (1991)A Reliability-Generalization Study of Journal Peer Reviews: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Inter-Rater Reliability and Its Determinants (2010)Responsible Conduct of Research (2022)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)Yoga as a therapeutic intervention: a bibliometric analysis of published research studies. (2004)The Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials of Traditional Chinese Medicine: A Survey of 13 Randomly Selected Journals from Mainland China (2007)Clinical Trials of Meditation Practices in Health Care: Characteristics and Quality (2008)A guide to interpreting discordant systematic reviews. (1997)Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions (1997)Systematic literature reviews (2005)Compliance with QUOROM and quality of reporting of overlapping meta-analyses on the role of acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast associated nephropathy: case study (2006)The Value of “Traditional” Reviews in the Era of Systematic Reviewing (2009)Perusing the literature: Comparison of MEDLINE searching with a perinatal trials database (1985)Optimal search strategy for clinical trials in the Latin American and Caribbean Health Science Literature Database (LILACS) (1997)Systematic reviews of trials and other studies. (1998)MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane index most primary studies but not abstracts included in orthopedic meta-analyses (2009)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1999Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement4,828 cited
  • 1994Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews1,677 cited
  • 1991Agreement among reviewers of review articles283 cited
  • 2001The methodological quality of randomized controlled trials of homeopathy, herbal medicines and acupuncture186 cited
  • 2003How objective are systematic reviews? Differences between reviews on complementary medicine171 cited
  • 1992The comprehensiveness of Medline and Embase computer searches84 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work